Does meter-scale snow data matter for modeling alpine plant distribution? A comparison of four data sources at two resolutions

• Four different snow melt-out data sources at high to very high spatial resolution • Comparison of predictive power of these melt-out datasets in SDMs • Fine-scale and in-situ melt-out did not improve SDMs more than coarse-scale melt-out • Coarse-scale melt-out from satellite imagery and a process-based snow model performed surprisingly well in SDMs • Collection of fine-scale melt-out data might be worthwhile for individual species, but not in general Snow cover is a crucial driver for plant species distributions in cold environments. The primary source of snow cover data used in distribution models is remotely sensed satellite imagery, which is characterized by coarser spatial resolutions than plot-scale observations of plant distributions. This scale-mismatch was hypothesized to limit model accuracy. Here, we used a common modeling framework to assess the contribution of snow melt-out dates derived from four data sources (satellite imagery, numerical snowpack modeling, webcam imagery and in-situ soil temperature measurements) at 1 m and 20 m spatial resolution to the predictive power of distribution models of 74 plant species in an alpine landscape of the Austrian Alps. We found that >80 % of the distribution models of all species were significantly improved by at least one snow melt-out data set when considering Area Under the Curve (AUC). Satellite-based melt-out led to significantly improved models for the highest number of species (>50 % for AUC) and increased True-Skill-Statistic and AUC on average by 16 % and 5 %, respectively. Surprisingly, fine-scale and in-situ measured melt-out data did not improve models more than the coarser scale (20 m) satellite-based melt-out data. Moreover, numerical snowpack modeling delivered results comparable to the other sources, which supports its use for projecting future species distributions. We conclude that the additional effort needed for producing high resolution, in-situ datasets as compared to commonly used satellite imagery might hence be worthwhile for some species but not for plant distribution modeling in cold ecosystems in general.