Comparative Analysis of Statistical and AI-Based Methods for Livestock Monitoring in Extensive Systems

In recent years, the research focusing on extensive farming systems has attracted considerable interest among experts in the field. Environmental sustainability and animal welfare are emerging as key elements, assuming a crucial role in global agriculture. In this context, monitoring animals is important not only to ensure their welfare, but also to preserve the balance of the land. Inadequate grazing management can in fact damage vegetation due to soil erosion. Therefore, monitoring the habits of animals during grazing is a challenging and crucial task for livestock management. Internet of Things (IoT) technologies, which allow for remote and real-time monitoring, may be a valid solution to these challenges in extensive farms where farmer-to-animal contact is not usual. In this regard, this paper examined three different methods to classify the behavioral activities of grazing cows, by using data collected with collars equipped with accelerometers. Three distinct approaches were compared: the former based on statistical methods, and the other on the use of Machine and Deep Learning techniques. From the comparison of the results obtained, strengths and weaknesses of each approach were examined, so to determine the most appropriate choice in relation to the characteristics of extensive livestock systems. In detail, Machine and Deep Learning-based approaches were found to be more accurate but highly energy-intensive. Therefore, in rural environments, the approach based on statistical methods, combined with LPWAN applications, was preferable due to its long range and low energy consumption. Ultimately, the statistical approach was found to be 64% accurate in classifying four behavioral classes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app152011116
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Food Supply Chain Traceability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.16

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Statistical and AI-Based Methods for Livestock Monitoring in Extensive Systems

Dominga Mancuso, Simona M.C. Porto, Marco Bonfanti, Giulia Castagnolo
1 citations
Applied Sciences
Food Supply Chain Traceability
1.16
article

Comparative Analysis of Statistical and AI-Based Methods for Livestock Monitoring in Extensive Systems

Dominga Mancuso, Simona M.C. Porto, Marco Bonfanti, Giulia Castagnolo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In recent years, the research focusing on extensive farming systems has attracted considerable interest among experts in the field. Environmental sustainability and animal welfare are emerging as key elements, assuming a crucial role in global agriculture. In this context, monitoring animals is important not only to ensure their welfare, but also to preserve the balance of the land. Inadequate grazing management can in fact damage vegetation due to soil erosion. Therefore, monitoring the habits of animals during grazing is a challenging and crucial task for livestock management. Internet of Things (IoT) technologies, which allow for remote and real-time monitoring, may be a valid solution to these challenges in extensive farms where farmer-to-animal contact is not usual. In this regard, this paper examined three different methods to classify the behavioral activities of grazing cows, by using data collected with collars equipped with accelerometers. Three distinct approaches were compared: the former based on statistical methods, and the other on the use of Machine and Deep Learning techniques. From the comparison of the results obtained, strengths and weaknesses of each approach were examined, so to determine the most appropriate choice in relation to the characteristics of extensive livestock systems. In detail, Machine and Deep Learning-based approaches were found to be more accurate but highly energy-intensive. Therefore, in rural environments, the approach based on statistical methods, combined with LPWAN applications, was preferable due to its long range and low energy consumption. Ultimately, the statistical approach was found to be 64% accurate in classifying four behavioral classes.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(20)
University of Messina (IT), University of Catania (IT)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Food Supply Chain Traceability
1.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.