Molecular Subtypes and Survival Patterns in Female Breast Cancer: Insights from a 12-Year Cohort

<i>Background and Objectives:</i> Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers in women and the most common cause of cancer death. Hormone receptors, specifically the estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR), as well as human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (Her2), are tumor-specific markers used to guide breast cancer therapy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of tumor biology, including ER, PR, and Her2 expression, on survival in female breast cancer. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> This retrospective cohort study represents an analysis of 2016 female breast cancer cases using anonymized data. We reviewed cases of female breast cancer diagnosed from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2021, in the Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Diakoneo Diak Klinikum Schwäbisch Hall, Germany. Data on clinical, pathology, immunohistochemistry, and follow-up characteristics were retrieved from the clinic's database. To interpret the data, we used the software IBM SPSS Statistics 20, and, to account for multiple comparisons, we used a Bonferroni-adjusted significance level of 0.004. In the survival analysis, the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test of equality of survival distributions were applied. <i>Results:</i> Among 2016 female breast cancer cases, 84.5% (1703/2016) were hormone receptor (HR)-positive. The 5-year overall survival was 0.873 (95% CI (0.851, 0.895); 99.6% CI (0.841, 0.905)) for HR-positive patients and 0.760 (95% CI (0.713, 0.807); 99.6% CI (0.691, 0.829)) for HR-negative patients (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Statistically significant differences were observed among HR+/HER2+, HR+/HER2-, HR-/HER2+, and triple-negative subtypes (<i>p</i> = 0.003). When comparing survival distributions based solely on HER2 expression (positive vs. negative), no statistically significant difference was observed (<i>p</i> = 0.29). <i>Conclusions:</i> Statistically significant differences in unadjusted overall survival distributions were observed among breast cancer molecular subtypes. HR-positive breast cancers demonstrated better overall survival than HR-negative cancers, while no statistically significant difference in unadjusted survival was observed between HER2-positive and HER2-negative groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61101858
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Molecular Subtypes and Survival Patterns in Female Breast Cancer: Insights from a 12-Year Cohort

A. Rempen, Vlad Bogdan Varzaru, Ingolf Juhasz‐Böss, Aurica Elisabeta Moatar et al.
Medicina
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Molecular Subtypes and Survival Patterns in Female Breast Cancer: Insights from a 12-Year Cohort

A. Rempen, Vlad Bogdan Varzaru, Ingolf Juhasz‐Böss, Aurica Elisabeta Moatar, Ionuț Marcel Cobec, Sarah Huwer, Peter Seropian
article en

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives:</i> Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers in women and the most common cause of cancer death. Hormone receptors, specifically the estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR), as well as human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (Her2), are tumor-specific markers used to guide breast cancer therapy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of tumor biology, including ER, PR, and Her2 expression, on survival in female breast cancer. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> This retrospective cohort study represents an analysis of 2016 female breast cancer cases using anonymized data. We reviewed cases of female breast cancer diagnosed from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2021, in the Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Diakoneo Diak Klinikum Schwäbisch Hall, Germany. Data on clinical, pathology, immunohistochemistry, and follow-up characteristics were retrieved from the clinic's database. To interpret the data, we used the software IBM SPSS Statistics 20, and, to account for multiple comparisons, we used a Bonferroni-adjusted significance level of 0.004. In the survival analysis, the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test of equality of survival distributions were applied. <i>Results:</i> Among 2016 female breast cancer cases, 84.5% (1703/2016) were hormone receptor (HR)-positive. The 5-year overall survival was 0.873 (95% CI (0.851, 0.895); 99.6% CI (0.841, 0.905)) for HR-positive patients and 0.760 (95% CI (0.713, 0.807); 99.6% CI (0.691, 0.829)) for HR-negative patients (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Statistically significant differences were observed among HR+/HER2+, HR+/HER2-, HR-/HER2+, and triple-negative subtypes (<i>p</i> = 0.003). When comparing survival distributions based solely on HER2 expression (positive vs. negative), no statistically significant difference was observed (<i>p</i> = 0.29). <i>Conclusions:</i> Statistically significant differences in unadjusted overall survival distributions were observed among breast cancer molecular subtypes. HR-positive breast cancers demonstrated better overall survival than HR-negative cancers, while no statistically significant difference in unadjusted survival was observed between HER2-positive and HER2-negative groups.

MedicinaVol. 61(10)
University Medical Center Freiburg (DE), Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara (RO), Krankenhäuser Landkreis Freudenstadt (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.