Safeguarding large language models: a survey

In the burgeoning field of Large Language Models (LLMs), developing a robust safety mechanism, colloquially known as "safeguards" or "guardrails", has become imperative to ensure the ethical use of LLMs within prescribed boundaries. This article provides a systematic literature review on the current status of this critical mechanism. It discusses its major challenges and how it can be enhanced into a comprehensive mechanism dealing with ethical issues in various contexts. First, the paper elucidates the current landscape of safeguarding mechanisms that major LLM service providers and the open-source community employ. This is followed by the techniques to evaluate, analyze, and enhance some (un)desirable properties that a guardrail might want to enforce, such as hallucinations, fairness, privacy, and so on. Based on them, we review techniques to circumvent these controls (i.e., attacks), to defend the attacks, and to reinforce the guardrails. While the techniques mentioned above represent the current status and the active research trends, we also discuss several challenges that cannot be easily dealt with by the methods and present our vision on how to implement a comprehensive guardrail through the full consideration of multi-disciplinary approach, neural-symbolic method, and systems development lifecycle.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Artificial Intelligence Review
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-025-11389-2
Citations
26
Primary Topic
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
64.51
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safeguarding large language models: a survey

Xiaowei Huang, Gaojie Jin, Ronghui Mu, Tianle Zhang et al.
26 citations
Artificial Intelligence Review
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
64.51
article

Safeguarding large language models: a survey

Xiaowei Huang, Gaojie Jin, Ronghui Mu, Tianle Zhang, Yanghao Zhang, Yi Dong, Jie Meng, Jinwei Hu, Yi Qi, Siqi Sun, Saddek Bensalem, Changshun Wu
article en
26 citations

Abstract

In the burgeoning field of Large Language Models (LLMs), developing a robust safety mechanism, colloquially known as "safeguards" or "guardrails", has become imperative to ensure the ethical use of LLMs within prescribed boundaries. This article provides a systematic literature review on the current status of this critical mechanism. It discusses its major challenges and how it can be enhanced into a comprehensive mechanism dealing with ethical issues in various contexts. First, the paper elucidates the current landscape of safeguarding mechanisms that major LLM service providers and the open-source community employ. This is followed by the techniques to evaluate, analyze, and enhance some (un)desirable properties that a guardrail might want to enforce, such as hallucinations, fairness, privacy, and so on. Based on them, we review techniques to circumvent these controls (i.e., attacks), to defend the attacks, and to reinforce the guardrails. While the techniques mentioned above represent the current status and the active research trends, we also discuss several challenges that cannot be easily dealt with by the methods and present our vision on how to implement a comprehensive guardrail through the full consideration of multi-disciplinary approach, neural-symbolic method, and systems development lifecycle.

Artificial Intelligence ReviewVol. 58(12)
Saint-Gobain (France) (FR), Loughborough University (GB), University of Liverpool (GB), Université Stendhal – Grenoble 3 (FR), Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire de Physique (FR), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
64.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.