Breathing interventions for spinal pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

ObjectiveIndividuals with spinal pain often show breathing dysfunctions. Although the effects of breathing interventions in general have been studied, no distinctions regarding types of breathing interventions were made. Therefore, we summarized the effects of different types of breathing interventions on spinal pain and disability.Data sourcesPubMed, Web of Science, PEDro, Cochrane, PsycArticles, and Embase were systematically searched till September 2, 2025.Review methodsStudies that described therapies using active instructions to modulate breathing or increase breathing awareness in adults with spinal pain were eligible. Breathing interventions were categorized into slow deep breathing, respiratory resistive breathing, and breathing awareness. Effects were subdivided into additional (breathing intervention + other intervention vs. other intervention) and comparative effects (breathing intervention vs. other intervention). The Downs and Black checklist was used to assess methodological quality. Meta-analyses were performed with standardized mean differences, and certainty of evidence was evaluated based on the GRADE assessment.ResultsTwenty studies involving 814 participants were included. Seventeen were of fair to good quality, three of poor quality. Meta-analyses revealed that slow deep breathing positively affected spinal pain (<i>n</i> = 223; SMD = -1.03; low certainty of evidence) and disability (<i>n</i> = 132; SMD = -1.34; very low certainty of evidence) when added to other interventions. Moreover, respiratory resistive breathing decreased spinal pain compared to other interventions (<i>n</i> = 75; SMD = -1.31; low certainty of evidence).ConclusionBreathing interventions may be valuable for the management of patients with spinal pain. Clinicians should be aware of, and consider, the various types of breathing interventions and their underlying mechanisms to tailor them to the treatment goals of their patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Rehabilitation
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251382790
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Breathing interventions for spinal pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Kris Bogaerts, Nina Goossens, Sim Klaps, Elke Vlemincx et al.
Clinical Rehabilitation
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Breathing interventions for spinal pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Kris Bogaerts, Nina Goossens, Sim Klaps, Elke Vlemincx, Lotte Janssens, Charlotte Amerijckx, Sofie Van Wesemael
article en

Abstract

ObjectiveIndividuals with spinal pain often show breathing dysfunctions. Although the effects of breathing interventions in general have been studied, no distinctions regarding types of breathing interventions were made. Therefore, we summarized the effects of different types of breathing interventions on spinal pain and disability.Data sourcesPubMed, Web of Science, PEDro, Cochrane, PsycArticles, and Embase were systematically searched till September 2, 2025.Review methodsStudies that described therapies using active instructions to modulate breathing or increase breathing awareness in adults with spinal pain were eligible. Breathing interventions were categorized into slow deep breathing, respiratory resistive breathing, and breathing awareness. Effects were subdivided into additional (breathing intervention + other intervention vs. other intervention) and comparative effects (breathing intervention vs. other intervention). The Downs and Black checklist was used to assess methodological quality. Meta-analyses were performed with standardized mean differences, and certainty of evidence was evaluated based on the GRADE assessment.ResultsTwenty studies involving 814 participants were included. Seventeen were of fair to good quality, three of poor quality. Meta-analyses revealed that slow deep breathing positively affected spinal pain (<i>n</i> = 223; SMD = -1.03; low certainty of evidence) and disability (<i>n</i> = 132; SMD = -1.34; very low certainty of evidence) when added to other interventions. Moreover, respiratory resistive breathing decreased spinal pain compared to other interventions (<i>n</i> = 75; SMD = -1.31; low certainty of evidence).ConclusionBreathing interventions may be valuable for the management of patients with spinal pain. Clinicians should be aware of, and consider, the various types of breathing interventions and their underlying mechanisms to tailor them to the treatment goals of their patients.

Clinical RehabilitationVol. 39(12)
Department of Health (ZA), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), Hasselt University (BE), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.