Changing lenses on lenses –Function creep with public camera surveillance in the Netherlands?

The paper explores the notion of function creep – a gradual transformation of a data processing system’s original purpose or activities – in the context of public camera surveillance in the Netherlands. Public camera surveillance here refers to digital cameras (e.g., CCTV), possibly with artificial intelligence (AI) extension(s) (e.g., for automatic violence detection), controlled by Dutch law enforcement agencies for public safety purposes. The paper is structured around three pillars: technology, law and practice. The technology pillar highlights relevant technical characteristics of camera surveillance that afford function creep, after which the law pillar maps out legal frameworks related to (preventing) function creep (notably, the principle of purpose limitation). The final pillar, practice, draws on qualitative empirical data collected from Dutch law enforcement organizations. With this three-dimensional approach, the paper illustrates how function creep occurs, the accountability challenges it poses and potential ways of resolving them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computer law & security review
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2025.106221
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Technology, Environment, Urban Planning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Changing lenses on lenses –Function creep with public camera surveillance in the Netherlands?

Francien Dechesne, Nanou van Iersel
1 citations
Computer law & security review
Technology, Environment, Urban Planning
17.27
article

Changing lenses on lenses –Function creep with public camera surveillance in the Netherlands?

Francien Dechesne, Nanou van Iersel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The paper explores the notion of function creep – a gradual transformation of a data processing system’s original purpose or activities – in the context of public camera surveillance in the Netherlands. Public camera surveillance here refers to digital cameras (e.g., CCTV), possibly with artificial intelligence (AI) extension(s) (e.g., for automatic violence detection), controlled by Dutch law enforcement agencies for public safety purposes. The paper is structured around three pillars: technology, law and practice. The technology pillar highlights relevant technical characteristics of camera surveillance that afford function creep, after which the law pillar maps out legal frameworks related to (preventing) function creep (notably, the principle of purpose limitation). The final pillar, practice, draws on qualitative empirical data collected from Dutch law enforcement organizations. With this three-dimensional approach, the paper illustrates how function creep occurs, the accountability challenges it poses and potential ways of resolving them.

Computer law & security reviewVol. 59
Leiden University (NL), University of Applied Sciences Leiden (NL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Technology, Environment, Urban Planning
17.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Changing lenses on lenses –Function creep with public camera surveillance in the Netherlands? — Francien Dechesne, Nanou van Iersel · Computer law & security review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS