Spin-State and Reorganization Energy Considerations for Metal-Centered Photoredox Catalysis

Transition-metal complexes featuring metal-centered excited states have recently emerged as mechanistically distinct platforms for selective photochemistry, including photoredox catalysis. Among these, Co(III) complexes have demonstrated productive photoinduced electron transfer via the <sup>3</sup>T<sub>1</sub> metal-centered state. In contrast, photoreactivity from the <sup>5</sup>T<sub>2</sub> metal-centered state in Fe(II) polypyridyl complexes remains limited. Building on our prior report concerning reactivity associated with the <sup>5</sup>T<sub>2</sub> state in [Fe(tren(py)<sub>3</sub>)]<sup>2+</sup> (tren(py)<sub>3</sub> = tris(2-pyridylmethyliminoethyl)-amine), we introduced stronger-field ligands in an effort to increase excited-state energies of Fe(II) polypyridyl complexes and enhance reactivity. Despite achieving nanosecond-scale excited-state lifetimes and favorable thermodynamic driving forces, no photoreactivity was observed. Reinvestigation of the observations previously reported for [Fe(tren(py)<sub>3</sub>)]<sup>2+</sup> revealed interactions between the metal complex and the substrate in their respective ground states that mimicked dynamic quenching of the chromophore, prompting a reassessment of mechanistic considerations inherent in leveraging reductive chemistry from the <sup>5</sup>T<sub>2</sub> excited state of Fe(II). Our analysis indicates that electron transfer from the <sup>5</sup>T<sub>2</sub> excited state of a low-spin d<sup>6</sup> metal is subject to significant barriers both in terms of reorganization energies and spin conservation that undermines its ability to act as an electron donor for photoredox catalysis. In contrast, ligand fields that are sufficient to stabilize the <sup>3</sup>T<sub>1</sub> excited state have available to them numerous spin-allowed and, in certain cases, near-barrierless pathways to engage in excited-state electron transfer (both oxidative and reductive depending on the identity of the metal). These results highlight the critical role of spin-state changes and their associated reorganization energy requirements in metal-centered photoredox catalysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5c14935
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Radical Photochemical Reactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spin-State and Reorganization Energy Considerations for Metal-Centered Photoredox Catalysis

Björn Pfund, Atanu Ghosh, Bekah E. Bowers, James K. McCusker et al.
2 citations
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Radical Photochemical Reactions
1.87
article

Spin-State and Reorganization Energy Considerations for Metal-Centered Photoredox Catalysis

Björn Pfund, Atanu Ghosh, Bekah E. Bowers, James K. McCusker, Hayden F. Beissel
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Transition-metal complexes featuring metal-centered excited states have recently emerged as mechanistically distinct platforms for selective photochemistry, including photoredox catalysis. Among these, Co(III) complexes have demonstrated productive photoinduced electron transfer via the <sup>3</sup>T<sub>1</sub> metal-centered state. In contrast, photoreactivity from the <sup>5</sup>T<sub>2</sub> metal-centered state in Fe(II) polypyridyl complexes remains limited. Building on our prior report concerning reactivity associated with the <sup>5</sup>T<sub>2</sub> state in [Fe(tren(py)<sub>3</sub>)]<sup>2+</sup> (tren(py)<sub>3</sub> = tris(2-pyridylmethyliminoethyl)-amine), we introduced stronger-field ligands in an effort to increase excited-state energies of Fe(II) polypyridyl complexes and enhance reactivity. Despite achieving nanosecond-scale excited-state lifetimes and favorable thermodynamic driving forces, no photoreactivity was observed. Reinvestigation of the observations previously reported for [Fe(tren(py)<sub>3</sub>)]<sup>2+</sup> revealed interactions between the metal complex and the substrate in their respective ground states that mimicked dynamic quenching of the chromophore, prompting a reassessment of mechanistic considerations inherent in leveraging reductive chemistry from the <sup>5</sup>T<sub>2</sub> excited state of Fe(II). Our analysis indicates that electron transfer from the <sup>5</sup>T<sub>2</sub> excited state of a low-spin d<sup>6</sup> metal is subject to significant barriers both in terms of reorganization energies and spin conservation that undermines its ability to act as an electron donor for photoredox catalysis. In contrast, ligand fields that are sufficient to stabilize the <sup>3</sup>T<sub>1</sub> excited state have available to them numerous spin-allowed and, in certain cases, near-barrierless pathways to engage in excited-state electron transfer (both oxidative and reductive depending on the identity of the metal). These results highlight the critical role of spin-state changes and their associated reorganization energy requirements in metal-centered photoredox catalysis.

Journal of the American Chemical SocietyVol. 147(43)
Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Radical Photochemical Reactions
1.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.