A Survey on Parallel Reasoning

Abstract As Large Language Models (LLMs) evolve, parallel reasoning has emerged as a vital inference paradigm that enhances robustness by concurrently exploring multiple thought trajectories. Unlike fragile sequential methods, parallel reasoning expands inference breadth to significantly improve problem-solving performance. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the progress and challenges in this burgeoning field. We first formally define parallel reasoning and distinguish it from sequential paradigms like Chain-of-Thought. Then, we propose a novel taxonomy to categorize advanced techniques into non-interactive reasoning, interactive collaboration, and efficiency-oriented decoding strategies. Furthermore, we examine diverse application scenarios, including complex problem-solving and reliability enhancement. Finally, we identify core challenges and outline future research directions. This work serves as a strategic roadmap to foster further innovation in parallel reasoning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
National Science Review
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwag599
Primary Topic
Semantic Web and Ontologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A Survey on Parallel Reasoning

Liu Jing, Linghui Meng, Tong Xu, Zhi Zheng et al.
National Science Review
Semantic Web and Ontologies
article

A Survey on Parallel Reasoning

Liu Jing, Linghui Meng, Tong Xu, Zhi Zheng, Enhong Chen, Haifeng Wang, Ziqi Wang, Yilong Chen, Chen Ying Zhu, Zhongli Li, Hua Wu
article en

Abstract

Abstract As Large Language Models (LLMs) evolve, parallel reasoning has emerged as a vital inference paradigm that enhances robustness by concurrently exploring multiple thought trajectories. Unlike fragile sequential methods, parallel reasoning expands inference breadth to significantly improve problem-solving performance. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the progress and challenges in this burgeoning field. We first formally define parallel reasoning and distinguish it from sequential paradigms like Chain-of-Thought. Then, we propose a novel taxonomy to categorize advanced techniques into non-interactive reasoning, interactive collaboration, and efficiency-oriented decoding strategies. Furthermore, we examine diverse application scenarios, including complex problem-solving and reliability enhancement. Finally, we identify core challenges and outline future research directions. This work serves as a strategic roadmap to foster further innovation in parallel reasoning.

National Science Review
University of Science and Technology of China (CN), The University of Sydney (AU), Baidu (China) (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Semantic Web and Ontologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Survey on Parallel Reasoning — Liu Jing, Linghui Meng, et al. · National Science Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS