Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening and Risk Assessment through Predictive Modeling on Medical Images and Records

Colonoscopy screening effectively identifies and removes polyps before they progress to colorectal cancer (CRC), but current follow-up guidelines rely primarily on histopathologic features, overlooking other important CRC risk factors. Variability in polyp characterization among pathologists also hinders consistent surveillance decisions. Advances in digital pathology and deep learning enable the integration of pathology slides and medical records for more accurate progression risk prediction. Using data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry, including longitudinal follow-up, a transformer-based model for histopathology image analysis was adapted to predict 5-year progression risk. Multi-modal fusion strategies were further explored to combine clinical records with deep learning-derived image features. Training the model to predict intermediate clinical variables improved 5-year progression risk prediction [area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC), 0.630] compared with direct prediction (AUC, 0.615; P = 0.013). Integrating whole-slide imaging-based model predictions with nonimaging features further improved performance (AUC, 0.672), significantly outperforming the nonimaging-only approach (AUC, 0.666; P = 0.002). These results highlight the value of integrating diverse data modalities with computational methods to enhance progression risk stratification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal Of Pathology
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2025.09.016
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening and Risk Assessment through Predictive Modeling on Medical Images and Records

Arief A. Suriawinata, William Hisey, Joseph Carl Anderson, Lynn F. Butterly et al.
1 citations
American Journal Of Pathology
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
1.05
article

Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening and Risk Assessment through Predictive Modeling on Medical Images and Records

Arief A. Suriawinata, William Hisey, Joseph Carl Anderson, Lynn F. Butterly, Saeed Hassanpour, Shuai Jiang, Christina M. Robinson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Colonoscopy screening effectively identifies and removes polyps before they progress to colorectal cancer (CRC), but current follow-up guidelines rely primarily on histopathologic features, overlooking other important CRC risk factors. Variability in polyp characterization among pathologists also hinders consistent surveillance decisions. Advances in digital pathology and deep learning enable the integration of pathology slides and medical records for more accurate progression risk prediction. Using data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry, including longitudinal follow-up, a transformer-based model for histopathology image analysis was adapted to predict 5-year progression risk. Multi-modal fusion strategies were further explored to combine clinical records with deep learning-derived image features. Training the model to predict intermediate clinical variables improved 5-year progression risk prediction [area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC), 0.630] compared with direct prediction (AUC, 0.615; P = 0.013). Integrating whole-slide imaging-based model predictions with nonimaging features further improved performance (AUC, 0.672), significantly outperforming the nonimaging-only approach (AUC, 0.666; P = 0.002). These results highlight the value of integrating diverse data modalities with computational methods to enhance progression risk stratification.

American Journal Of PathologyVol. 196(2)
Dartmouth College (US), Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.