From Loss to Transformation? Towards Pluralistic and Politicised Agrarian‐Climate Futures

ABSTRACT Understanding how actors perceive and anticipate future states of the world is gaining traction in climate change governance scholarship and related calls for sustainability transformations. However, smallholder farmers, indigenous groups, and local communities, who are expected to bear disproportionate burdens of loss and damage from climate change, remain underrepresented in future‐oriented research. In this paper, we outline key barriers to integrating bottom‐up perspectives on visions of the future in sustainability transformation research and develop a framework to support transdisciplinary research to more productively engage with diverse perspectives on agrarian‐climate futures. The framework is derived from (a) literature on climate change, loss and damage, anticipatory climate governance, and critical agrarian studies; (b) interviews, focus group discussions, and a stakeholder workshop in Ratanakiri province, Cambodia; and (c) an analysis of Cambodian climate change policies. It consists of five dimensions: (i) desirability; (ii) viability; (iii) agency; (iv) heuristics; and (v) responsibility. The framework aims to support researchers in better accounting for complex rural‐agrarian realities and reorienting future framingsfield from loss towards nurturing a “brighter” side of transformation. Integrating diverse rural‐agrarian perspectives on climate futures is critical for fostering and co‐creating more just and locally contingent pathways.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia Pacific Viewpoint
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.70015
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Loss to Transformation? Towards Pluralistic and Politicised Agrarian‐Climate Futures

Kelly Dorkenoo, Joel Persson, Van Thi Hai Nguyen, Monin Nong et al.
Asia Pacific Viewpoint
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
article

From Loss to Transformation? Towards Pluralistic and Politicised Agrarian‐Climate Futures

Kelly Dorkenoo, Joel Persson, Van Thi Hai Nguyen, Monin Nong, Sodavy Nhong
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Understanding how actors perceive and anticipate future states of the world is gaining traction in climate change governance scholarship and related calls for sustainability transformations. However, smallholder farmers, indigenous groups, and local communities, who are expected to bear disproportionate burdens of loss and damage from climate change, remain underrepresented in future‐oriented research. In this paper, we outline key barriers to integrating bottom‐up perspectives on visions of the future in sustainability transformation research and develop a framework to support transdisciplinary research to more productively engage with diverse perspectives on agrarian‐climate futures. The framework is derived from (a) literature on climate change, loss and damage, anticipatory climate governance, and critical agrarian studies; (b) interviews, focus group discussions, and a stakeholder workshop in Ratanakiri province, Cambodia; and (c) an analysis of Cambodian climate change policies. It consists of five dimensions: (i) desirability; (ii) viability; (iii) agency; (iv) heuristics; and (v) responsibility. The framework aims to support researchers in better accounting for complex rural‐agrarian realities and reorienting future framingsfield from loss towards nurturing a “brighter” side of transformation. Integrating diverse rural‐agrarian perspectives on climate futures is critical for fostering and co‐creating more just and locally contingent pathways.

Asia Pacific Viewpoint
University of Bern (CH), Cambodia Development Resource Institute (KH), Swiss Academy of Sciences (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.