What is greenwashing – a scoping review of greenwashing definitions and development of the Need-for-Balance Model

As organizations are under increasing pressure to demonstrate environmental responsibility, concerns about greenwashing have grown considerably. Despite its significance, there is no consensus on its definition, which complicates both research and mitigation efforts. To address this gap, we conducted a scoping review of 332 articles published across 174 journals, analyzing 646 definitions of greenwashing. While terminology varies, common themes emerge, and two main types of definitions can be distinguished: outcome-oriented and process-oriented definitions. Based on our findings, we define greenwashing as a discrepancy between environmental communication and actual environmental practices, whereby organizations portray themselves, their products/services, or their processes as greener than they are; this discrepancy arises through the communication of false, vague, irrelevant, or selective information. Furthermore, we propose the ‘Need for Balance Model’, which distinguishes between greenblushing/greenhushing, on the one hand, and greenwashing, on the other.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sustainable Business
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-025-00124-3
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Environmental Education and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What is greenwashing – a scoping review of greenwashing definitions and development of the Need-for-Balance Model

Thomas Koch, Nora Denner
5 citations
Journal of Sustainable Business
Environmental Education and Sustainability
12.11
article

What is greenwashing – a scoping review of greenwashing definitions and development of the Need-for-Balance Model

Thomas Koch, Nora Denner
article en
5 citations

Abstract

As organizations are under increasing pressure to demonstrate environmental responsibility, concerns about greenwashing have grown considerably. Despite its significance, there is no consensus on its definition, which complicates both research and mitigation efforts. To address this gap, we conducted a scoping review of 332 articles published across 174 journals, analyzing 646 definitions of greenwashing. While terminology varies, common themes emerge, and two main types of definitions can be distinguished: outcome-oriented and process-oriented definitions. Based on our findings, we define greenwashing as a discrepancy between environmental communication and actual environmental practices, whereby organizations portray themselves, their products/services, or their processes as greener than they are; this discrepancy arises through the communication of false, vague, irrelevant, or selective information. Furthermore, we propose the ‘Need for Balance Model’, which distinguishes between greenblushing/greenhushing, on the one hand, and greenwashing, on the other.

Journal of Sustainable BusinessVol. 10(1)
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Environmental Education and Sustainability
12.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.