The European Commission as a Social Advocate? Dissensus Over RRF Conditionality and Redistributive Reforms in the Neoliberal Baltics

Abstract The article analyses governance of the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) in three Baltic states as ‘extreme’ cases of RRF dissensus, where the Commission used RRF carrots and sticks to push tax‐financed social and tax reforms against national preferences. Bridging the literature on RRF governance and politicisation of Europe and drawing on document analysis, press and 26 interviews, the article argues that RRF dissensus is shaped by (1) the extent of EU conditionalities in plans' formulation and implementation; (2) divergence between the country‐specific recommendations and national policy preferences; and (3) involvement of broader social actors. Going beyond the literature's focus on the formulation phase of national plans and extending the focus to how the plans are implemented, the article sheds new light on the Commission's role as a social advocate in the EU's neoliberal periphery and its potentially adverse effects on democratic legitimacy and national ownership.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.70047
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The European Commission as a Social Advocate? Dissensus Over RRF Conditionality and Redistributive Reforms in the Neoliberal Baltics

Edgars Eihmanis
JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies
European Union Policy and Governance
article

The European Commission as a Social Advocate? Dissensus Over RRF Conditionality and Redistributive Reforms in the Neoliberal Baltics

Edgars Eihmanis
article en

Abstract

Abstract The article analyses governance of the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) in three Baltic states as ‘extreme’ cases of RRF dissensus, where the Commission used RRF carrots and sticks to push tax‐financed social and tax reforms against national preferences. Bridging the literature on RRF governance and politicisation of Europe and drawing on document analysis, press and 26 interviews, the article argues that RRF dissensus is shaped by (1) the extent of EU conditionalities in plans' formulation and implementation; (2) divergence between the country‐specific recommendations and national policy preferences; and (3) involvement of broader social actors. Going beyond the literature's focus on the formulation phase of national plans and extending the focus to how the plans are implemented, the article sheds new light on the Commission's role as a social advocate in the EU's neoliberal periphery and its potentially adverse effects on democratic legitimacy and national ownership.

JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies
University of Tartu (EE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.