A scoping review of machine learning applications in power system protection and disturbance management

The integration of renewable and distributed energy resources has fundamentally reshaped modern power systems, challenging conventional protection schemes built around centralized generation. This scoping review synthesizes recent literature on machine learning (ML) applications in power system protection and disturbance management, following the PRISMA for Scoping Reviews framework. Based on over 100 publications, three key objectives are addressed: (i) assessing the scope of ML research in protection tasks; (ii) evaluating ML performance across diverse operational scenarios; and (iii) identifying methods suitable for evolving grid conditions. Machine learning models often demonstrate high accuracy on simulated datasets; however, their performance under real-world conditions remains insufficiently validated. The existing literature is fragmented, with inconsistencies in methodological rigor, dataset quality, and evaluation metrics. This lack of standardization hampers the comparability of results and limits the generalizability of findings across different applications. To address these challenges, this review introduces a machine learning-oriented taxonomy for protection tasks, resolves key terminological inconsistencies, and advocates for standardized reporting practices. It further provides guidelines for comprehensive dataset documentation, methodological transparency, and consistent evaluation protocols, aiming to improve reproducibility and enhance the practical relevance of research outcomes. Critical gaps remain, including the scarcity of real-world validation, insufficient robustness testing, and limited consideration of deployment feasibility. Future research should prioritize public benchmark datasets, realistic validation methods, and advanced ML architectures. These steps are essential to move ML-based protection from theoretical promise to practical deployment in increasingly dynamic and decentralized power systems. • Machine learning models show high accuracy on simulated data but lack real-world validation. • Studies vary in task scope, dataset use, and evaluation, hindering comparisons. • A unified taxonomy is proposed for protection tasks in power system research. • Guidelines for dataset reporting and reproducibility support future benchmarks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2025.111257
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Power Systems Fault Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A scoping review of machine learning applications in power system protection and disturbance management

Christian Bergler, Siming Bayer, Georg Kordowich, Andreas Maier et al.
6 citations
International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems
Power Systems Fault Detection
7.29
article

A scoping review of machine learning applications in power system protection and disturbance management

Christian Bergler, Siming Bayer, Georg Kordowich, Andreas Maier, Johann Jäger, Julian Oelhaf, Mehran Pashaei
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The integration of renewable and distributed energy resources has fundamentally reshaped modern power systems, challenging conventional protection schemes built around centralized generation. This scoping review synthesizes recent literature on machine learning (ML) applications in power system protection and disturbance management, following the PRISMA for Scoping Reviews framework. Based on over 100 publications, three key objectives are addressed: (i) assessing the scope of ML research in protection tasks; (ii) evaluating ML performance across diverse operational scenarios; and (iii) identifying methods suitable for evolving grid conditions. Machine learning models often demonstrate high accuracy on simulated datasets; however, their performance under real-world conditions remains insufficiently validated. The existing literature is fragmented, with inconsistencies in methodological rigor, dataset quality, and evaluation metrics. This lack of standardization hampers the comparability of results and limits the generalizability of findings across different applications. To address these challenges, this review introduces a machine learning-oriented taxonomy for protection tasks, resolves key terminological inconsistencies, and advocates for standardized reporting practices. It further provides guidelines for comprehensive dataset documentation, methodological transparency, and consistent evaluation protocols, aiming to improve reproducibility and enhance the practical relevance of research outcomes. Critical gaps remain, including the scarcity of real-world validation, insufficient robustness testing, and limited consideration of deployment feasibility. Future research should prioritize public benchmark datasets, realistic validation methods, and advanced ML architectures. These steps are essential to move ML-based protection from theoretical promise to practical deployment in increasingly dynamic and decentralized power systems. • Machine learning models show high accuracy on simulated data but lack real-world validation. • Studies vary in task scope, dataset use, and evaluation, hindering comparisons. • A unified taxonomy is proposed for protection tasks in power system research. • Guidelines for dataset reporting and reproducibility support future benchmarks.

International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy SystemsVol. 172
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Amberg-Weiden (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Power Systems Fault Detection
7.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.