Methylation reference datasets from quartet DNA materials for benchmarking epigenome sequencing

The lack of quantitative methylation reference datasets (ground truth) and cross-laboratory reproducibility assessment hinders clinical translation of epigenome-wide sequencing technologies. Using certified Quartet DNA reference materials, here we generate 108 epigenome-sequencing datasets across three mainstream protocols (whole-genome bisulfite sequencing, enzymatic methyl-seq, and TET-assisted pyridine borane sequencing) with triplicates per sample across laboratories. We observe strand-specific methylation biases across all protocols and libraries. Cross-laboratory reproducibility analyses reveal high quantitative methylation levels agreement (mean Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) = 0.96) but low detection concordance (mean Jaccard index = 0.36). Using consensus voting, we construct genome-wide quantitative methylation reference datasets serving as ground truth for proficiency testing. Key technical parameters-including mean CpG depth, coverage, and strand consistency-correlate strongly with reference-dependent quality metrics (recall, PCC, and RMSE). Collectively, these resources establish foundational standards for benchmarking emerging epigenomic technologies and analytical pipelines, enabling robust, standardized quality control in research and clinical applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-64250-z
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.22

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methylation reference datasets from quartet DNA materials for benchmarking epigenome sequencing

Bo He, Yuanting Zheng, Xiaorou Guo, Sun Yuan et al.
4 citations
Nature Communications
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
3.22
article

Methylation reference datasets from quartet DNA materials for benchmarking epigenome sequencing

Bo He, Yuanting Zheng, Xiaorou Guo, Sun Yuan, Qingwang Chen, Wanwan Hou, Leming Shi, Yuanfeng Zhang, Yaqing Liu, Luyao Ren, R.C.W. Ma, Ying Yu, Fujun Qiu, Bingsi Li, Xiang Fang, Peng Ni, Yujing Zhang, Zhihong Zhang, Rui Zhang, Jianxin Wang, Jinming Li, Lianhua Dong, Weihong Xu, Shumeng Duan, Yu Ma
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The lack of quantitative methylation reference datasets (ground truth) and cross-laboratory reproducibility assessment hinders clinical translation of epigenome-wide sequencing technologies. Using certified Quartet DNA reference materials, here we generate 108 epigenome-sequencing datasets across three mainstream protocols (whole-genome bisulfite sequencing, enzymatic methyl-seq, and TET-assisted pyridine borane sequencing) with triplicates per sample across laboratories. We observe strand-specific methylation biases across all protocols and libraries. Cross-laboratory reproducibility analyses reveal high quantitative methylation levels agreement (mean Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) = 0.96) but low detection concordance (mean Jaccard index = 0.36). Using consensus voting, we construct genome-wide quantitative methylation reference datasets serving as ground truth for proficiency testing. Key technical parameters-including mean CpG depth, coverage, and strand consistency-correlate strongly with reference-dependent quality metrics (recall, PCC, and RMSE). Collectively, these resources establish foundational standards for benchmarking emerging epigenomic technologies and analytical pipelines, enabling robust, standardized quality control in research and clinical applications.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 16(1)
Central South University (CN), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Peking University (CN), Fudan University (CN), Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN), Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (CN), Burning Rock Biotech (China) (CN), Beijing Hospital (CN), Shanghai Institutes for International Studies (CN), National Center for Clinical Laboratories (CN), National Institute of Metrology (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Central South University, Fudan University, State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Higher Education Discipline Innovation Project, National Institute of Metrology, China
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
3.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.