Representing with model organisms: a refined DEKI account

Abstract In this article, we mobilize and refine the DEKI account of scientific representation to contend that model organisms are not models tout court but model ‘carriers,’ only abstracted and selected ‘parts’ of which are included in biological models. These parts correspond to phenomena of interest that are interpreted as mechanisms or other kinds of causal processes within certain theoretical domains. The models can then be used to represent similar target phenomena in other organisms. Our proposal paves the way to reconcile opposing positions apropos the representational status of model organisms and build a more robust epistemology of model organism-based research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Synthese
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-025-05267-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Representing with model organisms: a refined DEKI account

Alejandro Fábregas‐Tejeda, Guido I. Prieto
1 citations
Synthese
Philosophy and History of Science
18.02
article

Representing with model organisms: a refined DEKI account

Alejandro Fábregas‐Tejeda, Guido I. Prieto
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this article, we mobilize and refine the DEKI account of scientific representation to contend that model organisms are not models tout court but model ‘carriers,’ only abstracted and selected ‘parts’ of which are included in biological models. These parts correspond to phenomena of interest that are interpreted as mechanisms or other kinds of causal processes within certain theoretical domains. The models can then be used to represent similar target phenomena in other organisms. Our proposal paves the way to reconcile opposing positions apropos the representational status of model organisms and build a more robust epistemology of model organism-based research.

SyntheseVol. 206(5)
Bielefeld University (DE), Institute of Philosophy (CN)
London School of Economics and Political Science, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, KU Leuven, Universität Bielefeld, Vlaamse regering
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Philosophy and History of Science
18.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.