Contact with child protection services during pregnancy: a cross-sectional study using the eLIXIR Born in South London, UK maternity-child data linkage

In the last decade, rates of children with child protection agency involvement have increased in many high-income countries, including the UK. Disparities in both maternal and child health outcomes as well as child welfare referrals have been widely evidenced, yet no previous research has investigated contact with child protection agencies in the UK (Children’s Social Care, CSC) during pregnancy using linked maternity and mental health records. The aim of this study was to investigate characteristics of pregnant women when child protection agencies are involved and investigate what risk factors are associated with child protection agency contact during pregnancy. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study using linked electronic health records from maternity, neonatal, and mental health services in South London (eLIXIR-BiSL cohort). A cohort of singleton pregnancy records was created (October 2018 – April 2023). We used descriptive statistics to investigate sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and binomial regression to explore risk factors and characteristics associated with CSC contact during pregnancy. A cohort of 36,322 singleton pregnancy records was studied, with CSC contact identified in 2,206 records (6%). CSC contact was most frequently observed among Black and multiparous women, and those living in poorer socio-economic circumstances. Those with CSC contact more often had recorded medical, obstetric and psychiatric comorbidities compared to those without CSC contact. When investigating referral indications associated with CSC contact, we found 1,733 pregnancy records with risk factors indicating referral concordant with local guidance yet without any CSC contact. In contrast, in 913 pregnancies CSC contact occurred without any prescribed referral indication being identified. In this group, CSC contact was more frequently associated with Black or mixed ethnicity, social deprivation, maternal unemployment, single motherhood, maternal age under 25 years, previous domestic abuse disclosures, and previous mental health or CSC contact. In this UK population cohort, socio-economic and ethnic disparities were observed between those in contact with child protection agencies during pregnancy and those without. This continued to be observed when excluding those with referral indications associated with CSC involvement. Consistent guidance and a strengths-based family approach is needed to address referral disparities for this group of women and birthing people.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-08197-5
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.17

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contact with child protection services during pregnancy: a cross-sectional study using the eLIXIR Born in South London, UK maternity-child data linkage

Sam P. Burton, Elsa Montgomery, Paul T. Seed, Jane Sandall et al.
1 citations
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Health disparities and outcomes
2.17
article

Contact with child protection services during pregnancy: a cross-sectional study using the eLIXIR Born in South London, UK maternity-child data linkage

Sam P. Burton, Elsa Montgomery, Paul T. Seed, Jane Sandall, Kaat De Backer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In the last decade, rates of children with child protection agency involvement have increased in many high-income countries, including the UK. Disparities in both maternal and child health outcomes as well as child welfare referrals have been widely evidenced, yet no previous research has investigated contact with child protection agencies in the UK (Children’s Social Care, CSC) during pregnancy using linked maternity and mental health records. The aim of this study was to investigate characteristics of pregnant women when child protection agencies are involved and investigate what risk factors are associated with child protection agency contact during pregnancy. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study using linked electronic health records from maternity, neonatal, and mental health services in South London (eLIXIR-BiSL cohort). A cohort of singleton pregnancy records was created (October 2018 – April 2023). We used descriptive statistics to investigate sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and binomial regression to explore risk factors and characteristics associated with CSC contact during pregnancy. A cohort of 36,322 singleton pregnancy records was studied, with CSC contact identified in 2,206 records (6%). CSC contact was most frequently observed among Black and multiparous women, and those living in poorer socio-economic circumstances. Those with CSC contact more often had recorded medical, obstetric and psychiatric comorbidities compared to those without CSC contact. When investigating referral indications associated with CSC contact, we found 1,733 pregnancy records with risk factors indicating referral concordant with local guidance yet without any CSC contact. In contrast, in 913 pregnancies CSC contact occurred without any prescribed referral indication being identified. In this group, CSC contact was more frequently associated with Black or mixed ethnicity, social deprivation, maternal unemployment, single motherhood, maternal age under 25 years, previous domestic abuse disclosures, and previous mental health or CSC contact. In this UK population cohort, socio-economic and ethnic disparities were observed between those in contact with child protection agencies during pregnancy and those without. This continued to be observed when excluding those with referral indications associated with CSC involvement. Consistent guidance and a strengths-based family approach is needed to address referral disparities for this group of women and birthing people.

BMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthVol. 25(1)
King's College London (GB), Florence Nightingale Foundation (GB), Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Health disparities and outcomes
2.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.