Estimating the economic feasibility of additive manufacturing: a systematic literature review

Purpose The purpose of this systematic literature review paper on cost estimation and modeling in the context (AM) is to explore the scope and extent of solutions and conclusions presented in the research literature to support economic decision-making related to AM. Design/methodology/approach Following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guideline for systematic literature reviews, this study categorizes existing studies based on the decision situations addressed and identifies key themes and issues related to cost estimation and modeling. Findings The analysis of 255 studies reveals that literature provides a wide range of reviews and models to support strategic, tactical and operational decision-making related to AM application. Advanced models and tools have been developed for optimizing the AM-based value chain, including product design, production planning and supply chain management. However, as the economically feasible application areas of AM appear limited, it restricts the practical applicability of many of the complex optimization models. Originality/value This review analyzes the applicability of existing research in supporting strategic, tactical and operational planning concerning the economical use of AM and synthesizes the conclusions of previous studies regarding the economic feasibility of AM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rapid Prototyping Journal
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/rpj-08-2024-0340
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating the economic feasibility of additive manufacturing: a systematic literature review

Annastiina Rintala
1 citations
Rapid Prototyping Journal
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
0.68
article

Estimating the economic feasibility of additive manufacturing: a systematic literature review

Annastiina Rintala
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this systematic literature review paper on cost estimation and modeling in the context (AM) is to explore the scope and extent of solutions and conclusions presented in the research literature to support economic decision-making related to AM. Design/methodology/approach Following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guideline for systematic literature reviews, this study categorizes existing studies based on the decision situations addressed and identifies key themes and issues related to cost estimation and modeling. Findings The analysis of 255 studies reveals that literature provides a wide range of reviews and models to support strategic, tactical and operational decision-making related to AM application. Advanced models and tools have been developed for optimizing the AM-based value chain, including product design, production planning and supply chain management. However, as the economically feasible application areas of AM appear limited, it restricts the practical applicability of many of the complex optimization models. Originality/value This review analyzes the applicability of existing research in supporting strategic, tactical and operational planning concerning the economical use of AM and synthesizes the conclusions of previous studies regarding the economic feasibility of AM.

Rapid Prototyping JournalVol. 31(11)
Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
0.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.