Effects of Synchronized Ovulation Protocols on Reproductive Performance of Beef Cattle in Korea: A Retrospective Study of 755 Cases

Reproductive outcomes following synchronized ovulation protocol in beef cattle are influenced by multiple factors, making protocol selection based on farm-specific conditions essential. This retrospective study analyzed the relationship between pregnancy rates and associated factors under the CIDR (GnRH with CIDR insertion-PGF<sub>2α</sub> with CIDR removal-GnRH), GPG (GnRH-PGF<sub>2α</sub>-GnRH), and GPPG (GnRH-PGF<sub>2α</sub>-PGF<sub>2α</sub>-GnRH) protocols in Hanwoo cattle. The highest pregnancy rate was observed with the CIDR protocol (58.3%), whereas the GPG protocol yielded the lowest (47.5%). The CIDR protocol demonstrated superior suitability compared with the GPG protocol in first service (61.0% vs. 47.0%) and young breeding cattle (parity: 0-2; 61.6-70.0% vs. 47.5-48.6%). The dominant follicle size strongly associated with pregnancy success was 13-16 mm, and the CIDR protocol induced these follicles more frequently than the GPG protocol (50.2% vs. 35.5%). Although interpretive bias may exist from data collected from pregnant animals only, CIDR protocol significantly increased luteinizing hormone levels compared to GPG. The GPPG protocol produced outcomes that were improved relative to the GPG protocol and statistically comparable to the CIDR protocol. These findings addressed the study's objective, identifying optimal synchronized ovulation strategies and underscoring reproductive management importance for Korean Hanwoo operations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Veterinary Sciences
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12101001
Primary Topic
Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Synchronized Ovulation Protocols on Reproductive Performance of Beef Cattle in Korea: A Retrospective Study of 755 Cases

Jung‐Hong Ha, Seung-Joon Kim, T.-H. Kim, Sung-Ho Kim et al.
Veterinary Sciences
Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
article

Effects of Synchronized Ovulation Protocols on Reproductive Performance of Beef Cattle in Korea: A Retrospective Study of 755 Cases

Jung‐Hong Ha, Seung-Joon Kim, T.-H. Kim, Sung-Ho Kim, Sang-Yup Lee, Won‐Jae Lee, Saet-Byul Kim
article en

Abstract

Reproductive outcomes following synchronized ovulation protocol in beef cattle are influenced by multiple factors, making protocol selection based on farm-specific conditions essential. This retrospective study analyzed the relationship between pregnancy rates and associated factors under the CIDR (GnRH with CIDR insertion-PGF<sub>2α</sub> with CIDR removal-GnRH), GPG (GnRH-PGF<sub>2α</sub>-GnRH), and GPPG (GnRH-PGF<sub>2α</sub>-PGF<sub>2α</sub>-GnRH) protocols in Hanwoo cattle. The highest pregnancy rate was observed with the CIDR protocol (58.3%), whereas the GPG protocol yielded the lowest (47.5%). The CIDR protocol demonstrated superior suitability compared with the GPG protocol in first service (61.0% vs. 47.0%) and young breeding cattle (parity: 0-2; 61.6-70.0% vs. 47.5-48.6%). The dominant follicle size strongly associated with pregnancy success was 13-16 mm, and the CIDR protocol induced these follicles more frequently than the GPG protocol (50.2% vs. 35.5%). Although interpretive bias may exist from data collected from pregnant animals only, CIDR protocol significantly increased luteinizing hormone levels compared to GPG. The GPPG protocol produced outcomes that were improved relative to the GPG protocol and statistically comparable to the CIDR protocol. These findings addressed the study's objective, identifying optimal synchronized ovulation strategies and underscoring reproductive management importance for Korean Hanwoo operations.

Veterinary SciencesVol. 12(10)
Gumi University (KR), Kyungpook National University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.