Bioprinted Constructs in the Regulatory Landscape: Current State and Future Perspectives

Bioprinting has become one of the leading topics in biomedical research in the past decade, as demonstrated by the great surge in publications and proliferation of bioprinting facilities worldwide. Bioprinting has gained widespread popularity because of its potential to replicate complex biological structures, revolutionize in vitro testing, and tissue engineering. However, the clinical translation of bioprinted products remains a challenge. The regulatory approval of tissue-engineered products requires extensive preclinical and clinical trials with different standards worldwide. The regulatory landscape for bioprinted products is examined in the European Union, United States, China, and Australia. The current regulatory status of bioprinting is traced by exploring parallels with existing categories such as 3D printed medical devices, injectable hydrogels, and tissue engineering products. This perspective provides a comprehensive overview of the current state and regulatory landscape of bioprinted constructs, envisioning challenges, and strategies for their future integration into clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Materials
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202504037
Citations
3
Primary Topic
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bioprinted Constructs in the Regulatory Landscape: Current State and Future Perspectives

Liliang Ouyang, Khoon S. Lim, Antonella Motta, Devid Maniglio et al.
3 citations
Advanced Materials
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
2.02
article

Bioprinted Constructs in the Regulatory Landscape: Current State and Future Perspectives

Liliang Ouyang, Khoon S. Lim, Antonella Motta, Devid Maniglio, Lorenzo Moroni, Carlos Mota, Francesca Perin
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Bioprinting has become one of the leading topics in biomedical research in the past decade, as demonstrated by the great surge in publications and proliferation of bioprinting facilities worldwide. Bioprinting has gained widespread popularity because of its potential to replicate complex biological structures, revolutionize in vitro testing, and tissue engineering. However, the clinical translation of bioprinted products remains a challenge. The regulatory approval of tissue-engineered products requires extensive preclinical and clinical trials with different standards worldwide. The regulatory landscape for bioprinted products is examined in the European Union, United States, China, and Australia. The current regulatory status of bioprinting is traced by exploring parallels with existing categories such as 3D printed medical devices, injectable hydrogels, and tissue engineering products. This perspective provides a comprehensive overview of the current state and regulatory landscape of bioprinted constructs, envisioning challenges, and strategies for their future integration into clinical practice.

Advanced MaterialsVol. 38(4)
The University of Sydney (AU), University of Trento (IT), United Nations University – Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (NL), Maastricht University (NL), Tsinghua University (CN)
European Commission, Servier
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
2.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bioprinted Constructs in the Regulatory Landscape: Current State and Future Perspectives — Liliang Ouyang, Khoon S. Lim, et al. · Advanced Materials (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS