Far-Field Petrophysics for Saturation Mapping Beyond the Wellbore

Summary Most conventional logging-while-drilling (LWD) tools acquire real-time measurements from a few inches to a few feet away from the wellbore for lithology, porosity, and saturation evaluation. Deep and ultradeep resistivity tools were developed primarily for well placement and geomapping applications and can detect resistivity variations farther away, in all directions around the wellbore. This article describes the integration of deep and ultradeep resistivity measurements for saturation mapping beyond the wellbore. Deep and ultradeep resistivity tools can map multiple formation layers and determine the resistivity of those layers far from the wellbore. Because saturation is dependent on porosity and resistivity, a workflow has been developed to combine real-time shallow measurements with inverted LWD resistivity measurements and logging data from offset wells. The geological model is updated based on deep resistivity measurements, and petrophysical parameters for each layer, combined with inverted resistivity values, are used to derive saturation. Uncertainty is defined based on weighted uncertainty in porosity from offset wells and variation in resistivity across the mapped layers. Azimuthal resistivity measurements were also used to validate the inverted values and reduce uncertainties in cases of boundaries close to the wellbore. The workflow has been tested on several wells and different reservoirs, utilizing a combination of shallow and deep azimuthal data along with offset logs. Layers with different formation characteristics and saturation profiles were crossed, and the data were utilized to validate the mapped saturation values compared with the nearby measurements. The resulting saturation profile provided critical information that enhanced understanding of the reservoir and gave better insight into variation in the far field. Such information is critical for completion-design and well-placement decisions and aligns with the industry’s direction toward increased data analytics combining offset wells with real-time data. A continuous improvement of the model is expected as more wells are drilled and the database increases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SPE Journal
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2118/231160-pa
Primary Topic
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Far-Field Petrophysics for Saturation Mapping Beyond the Wellbore

Taufan Marhaendrajana, Dermawan Wibisono, Rayan Adil Ghanim, Eduard Bikchandaev et al.
SPE Journal
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
article

Far-Field Petrophysics for Saturation Mapping Beyond the Wellbore

Taufan Marhaendrajana, Dermawan Wibisono, Rayan Adil Ghanim, Eduard Bikchandaev, Ida Bagus Gede Hermawan Manuaba, Ahmed Taher
article en

Abstract

Summary Most conventional logging-while-drilling (LWD) tools acquire real-time measurements from a few inches to a few feet away from the wellbore for lithology, porosity, and saturation evaluation. Deep and ultradeep resistivity tools were developed primarily for well placement and geomapping applications and can detect resistivity variations farther away, in all directions around the wellbore. This article describes the integration of deep and ultradeep resistivity measurements for saturation mapping beyond the wellbore. Deep and ultradeep resistivity tools can map multiple formation layers and determine the resistivity of those layers far from the wellbore. Because saturation is dependent on porosity and resistivity, a workflow has been developed to combine real-time shallow measurements with inverted LWD resistivity measurements and logging data from offset wells. The geological model is updated based on deep resistivity measurements, and petrophysical parameters for each layer, combined with inverted resistivity values, are used to derive saturation. Uncertainty is defined based on weighted uncertainty in porosity from offset wells and variation in resistivity across the mapped layers. Azimuthal resistivity measurements were also used to validate the inverted values and reduce uncertainties in cases of boundaries close to the wellbore. The workflow has been tested on several wells and different reservoirs, utilizing a combination of shallow and deep azimuthal data along with offset logs. Layers with different formation characteristics and saturation profiles were crossed, and the data were utilized to validate the mapped saturation values compared with the nearby measurements. The resulting saturation profile provided critical information that enhanced understanding of the reservoir and gave better insight into variation in the far field. Such information is critical for completion-design and well-placement decisions and aligns with the industry’s direction toward increased data analytics combining offset wells with real-time data. A continuous improvement of the model is expected as more wells are drilled and the database increases.

SPE JournalVol. 30(12)
Bandung Institute of Technology (ID), Halliburton (United Kingdom) (GB), Saudi Aramco (Saudi Arabia) (SA), Dammam Central Hospital (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.