Comparative Accuracy of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography for Surveillance After Breast Cancer Treatment
For women with PHBC, DBT had better detection metrics compared with DM, as demonstrated by higher CDR, higher invasive CDR, and lower recall rate. However, the lack of significant reduction in interval cancer rate suggests that both DBT and DM may be used for posttreatment surveillance. Identifying effective imaging surveillance strategies for reducing interval cancer rates is needed to further improve posttreatment outcomes.
Authors
- Laura Ichikawa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0882-6662)
- Nehmat Houssami (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3641-952X)
- Rebecca A. Hubbard (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0879-0994)
- Louise M. Henderson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8356-9267)
- Janie M. Lee (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6452-8168)
- Jennifer M. Specht (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1484-2113)
- Naomi Noguchi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5662-1496)
- Yu‐Ru Su (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6150-960X)
- Ellen S. O’Meara (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2997-295X)
- Karla Kerlikowske (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8793-8779)
Institutions
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Brown University (US)
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Cancer Council NSW (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
- Published
- 2025-10-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2025.7057
- Primary Topic
- Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00