Social protection in Romania during the COVID-19 pandemic: who received non-financial support and who was left out?

Governments’ responses to the needs of social protection during the COVID-19 pandemic can constitute an analytical framework for developing better future strategies for crisis contexts. We study which groups of the Romanian population accessed measures of specific non-financial social protection between 2020 and 2022. Data collected through a national probabilistic representative survey (N > 1,000) allows us to use inferential statistics to explore relationships between individuals’ expectations of a welfare state, different types of potential vulnerabilities and their probability of benefiting from a series of measures of social protection. First, individuals’ high expectations of a welfare state increase their probability of being among those who accessed social protection. Secondly, the analyzed programs successfully responded to the needs of social protection of some vulnerable categories linked to disabilities, health problems and economic difficulties. Controlling for the economic wellbeing of the household and other factors, we found a higher statistically significant probability of being left out for individuals who live in households which include minor children and for those who were facing serious emotional issues (loneliness, anxiety, sadness, etc.). These findings from Romania hold relevance for broader European contexts, prompting discourse on the necessity for better calibration of social protection amidst crises.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Social Sciences
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2574407
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social protection in Romania during the COVID-19 pandemic: who received non-financial support and who was left out?

Sorina Corman, Alin Croitoru
Cogent Social Sciences
Employment and Welfare Studies
article

Social protection in Romania during the COVID-19 pandemic: who received non-financial support and who was left out?

Sorina Corman, Alin Croitoru
article en

Abstract

Governments’ responses to the needs of social protection during the COVID-19 pandemic can constitute an analytical framework for developing better future strategies for crisis contexts. We study which groups of the Romanian population accessed measures of specific non-financial social protection between 2020 and 2022. Data collected through a national probabilistic representative survey (N > 1,000) allows us to use inferential statistics to explore relationships between individuals’ expectations of a welfare state, different types of potential vulnerabilities and their probability of benefiting from a series of measures of social protection. First, individuals’ high expectations of a welfare state increase their probability of being among those who accessed social protection. Secondly, the analyzed programs successfully responded to the needs of social protection of some vulnerable categories linked to disabilities, health problems and economic difficulties. Controlling for the economic wellbeing of the household and other factors, we found a higher statistically significant probability of being left out for individuals who live in households which include minor children and for those who were facing serious emotional issues (loneliness, anxiety, sadness, etc.). These findings from Romania hold relevance for broader European contexts, prompting discourse on the necessity for better calibration of social protection amidst crises.

Cogent Social SciencesVol. 11(1)
Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Employment and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.