Contextualizing the Canon: Sociohistorical Change and the Future of Entrepreneurship Research

In this paper, we examine canonical studies of entrepreneurship since the mid-19th century to learn how engagement with past societal challenges shaped the evolution of entrepreneurship research over time. Contextualizing the intellectual history of research on entrepreneurship, we identify three main periods, showing that scholarly engagement with past sociohistorical challenges are reflected in five aspects of the configuration of entrepreneurial knowledge: (1) the metahistorical narratives defining the value of studying entrepreneurship (why), (2) the dominant forms of entrepreneurial action and organizing (what), (3) the nature of entrepreneurial agents (who), (4) the places where entrepreneurship is understood to happen (where), and (5) the disciplinary configurations of entrepreneurship research (how). We discuss the implications of this history for the future of entrepreneurship research in our own time, suggesting ways that contemporary social challenges may be reflected in future entrepreneurship research. Our findings offer entrepreneurship scholars a roadmap to chart the field’s engagement with our current sociohistorical moment and to more deeply reflect on contemporary societal challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Academy of Management Perspectives
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2023.0385
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contextualizing the Canon: Sociohistorical Change and the Future of Entrepreneurship Research

Friederike Welter, David A. Kirsch, R. Daniel Wadhwani
3 citations
Academy of Management Perspectives
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
8.28
article

Contextualizing the Canon: Sociohistorical Change and the Future of Entrepreneurship Research

Friederike Welter, David A. Kirsch, R. Daniel Wadhwani
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In this paper, we examine canonical studies of entrepreneurship since the mid-19th century to learn how engagement with past societal challenges shaped the evolution of entrepreneurship research over time. Contextualizing the intellectual history of research on entrepreneurship, we identify three main periods, showing that scholarly engagement with past sociohistorical challenges are reflected in five aspects of the configuration of entrepreneurial knowledge: (1) the metahistorical narratives defining the value of studying entrepreneurship (why), (2) the dominant forms of entrepreneurial action and organizing (what), (3) the nature of entrepreneurial agents (who), (4) the places where entrepreneurship is understood to happen (where), and (5) the disciplinary configurations of entrepreneurship research (how). We discuss the implications of this history for the future of entrepreneurship research in our own time, suggesting ways that contemporary social challenges may be reflected in future entrepreneurship research. Our findings offer entrepreneurship scholars a roadmap to chart the field’s engagement with our current sociohistorical moment and to more deeply reflect on contemporary societal challenges.

Academy of Management Perspectives
University of Southern California (US), University of Siegen (DE), California Southern University (US), Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (DE), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
8.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.