Reflections on a Principal of Research Ethics: Tom Beauchamp, Moral Specification, and Waivers of Informed Consent

Tom Beauchamp's work is deeply woven into the field of bioethics. In this article, we honor Professor Beauchamp's pioneering contributions to research ethics, focusing on his seminal work articulating the key ethical principles that have become central to our understanding of research ethics scholarship and practice. We then examine how Professor Beauchamp's analytical framework of shared moral principles for research ethics can inform a contemporary ethics challenge: when can the requirements of informed consent permissibly be relaxed for research studies embedded into clinical care? We use this example both to illustrate how conceptual analysis and moral specification can inform the work of investigators, institutional review boards, and others charged with ensuring the ethical conduct of human subjects research, and to highlight where further conceptual work and practical guidance are needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Bioethics
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2025.2570684
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reflections on a Principal of Research Ethics: Tom Beauchamp, Moral Specification, and Waivers of Informed Consent

Emily A. Largent, Stephanie R. Morain, David Wendler, Luke Gelinas et al.
5 citations
The American Journal of Bioethics
Ethics in Clinical Research
9.39
article

Reflections on a Principal of Research Ethics: Tom Beauchamp, Moral Specification, and Waivers of Informed Consent

Emily A. Largent, Stephanie R. Morain, David Wendler, Luke Gelinas, P. Pearl O’Rourke
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Tom Beauchamp's work is deeply woven into the field of bioethics. In this article, we honor Professor Beauchamp's pioneering contributions to research ethics, focusing on his seminal work articulating the key ethical principles that have become central to our understanding of research ethics scholarship and practice. We then examine how Professor Beauchamp's analytical framework of shared moral principles for research ethics can inform a contemporary ethics challenge: when can the requirements of informed consent permissibly be relaxed for research studies embedded into clinical care? We use this example both to illustrate how conceptual analysis and moral specification can inform the work of investigators, institutional review boards, and others charged with ensuring the ethical conduct of human subjects research, and to highlight where further conceptual work and practical guidance are needed.

The American Journal of BioethicsVol. 26(3)
Johns Hopkins University (US), California University of Pennsylvania (US), Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics (US), National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Ethics in Clinical Research
9.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.