A Revolution of Letters

Abstract Colonialism in Africa was a textual encounter, with writing operating as an essential tool for colonial governance as well as a visual embodiment of Western “rationality” and civilization. Somalis, a predominantly oral people spread out across five colonial territories in the Horn of Africa, resisted Latin-based orthographies for their language because of these associations, while anticolonial nationalism following the Second World War brought the orthography question to the forefront as Somalis vigorously debated the written form Somali should take. Following Somalia’s independence in 1960, the continued use of colonial languages for writing threatened the postcolonial nation-building project and its larger ambitions to unify the partitioned Somali territories into a Greater Somalia, a central objective of Pan-Somali nationalist politics. When General Mohamed Siad Barre seized power in 1969, the adoption of a Somali script became a priority for his socialist military government, as his authoritarian regime used visual practices of statecraft such as mass spectacles and textual production to establish a modern Pan-Somali nationalist identity. This article examines the history of the Somali orthography and the making of a nationalist discourse ecology that brought together text, sight, and spectacle in revolutionary Somalia at a time when the Somali state looked beyond its borders and mobilized for war.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Historical Review
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ahr/rhaf404
Primary Topic
Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Revolution of Letters

Safia Aidid
The American Historical Review
Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies
article

A Revolution of Letters

Safia Aidid
article en

Abstract

Abstract Colonialism in Africa was a textual encounter, with writing operating as an essential tool for colonial governance as well as a visual embodiment of Western “rationality” and civilization. Somalis, a predominantly oral people spread out across five colonial territories in the Horn of Africa, resisted Latin-based orthographies for their language because of these associations, while anticolonial nationalism following the Second World War brought the orthography question to the forefront as Somalis vigorously debated the written form Somali should take. Following Somalia’s independence in 1960, the continued use of colonial languages for writing threatened the postcolonial nation-building project and its larger ambitions to unify the partitioned Somali territories into a Greater Somalia, a central objective of Pan-Somali nationalist politics. When General Mohamed Siad Barre seized power in 1969, the adoption of a Somali script became a priority for his socialist military government, as his authoritarian regime used visual practices of statecraft such as mass spectacles and textual production to establish a modern Pan-Somali nationalist identity. This article examines the history of the Somali orthography and the making of a nationalist discourse ecology that brought together text, sight, and spectacle in revolutionary Somalia at a time when the Somali state looked beyond its borders and mobilized for war.

The American Historical Review
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Revolution of Letters — Safia Aidid · The American Historical Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS