Outcomes of EUS-Guided Gallbladder Drainage: A Case Series from a Tertiary Referral Center in Ireland

Background/Objectives: Cholecystectomy remains the gold-standard treatment for acute cholecystitis. However, in patients deemed unfit for surgery, alternative gallbladder drainage techniques are required. These include percutaneous gallbladder drainage (PT-GBD), endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ET-GBD), and the more recently adopted endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD). EUS-GBD has emerged as a promising minimally invasive option, offering high technical and clinical success with fewer complications and need for reinterventions. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of EUS-GBD in high-risk surgical patients with acute cholecystitis. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective study evaluating outcomes of EUS-GBD in a tertiary referral center in Ireland. Data from ten high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis who underwent EUS-GBD using a 15 mm × 10 mm HOT AXIOS lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) between October 2017 and September 2018 were analyzed. Parameters assessed included technical and clinical success, adverse events, and 1-year mortality. Results: The mean age of patients was 79.5 years (range 65–95). Technical success of stent placement was achieved in all patients with no immediate complications. A trans-gastric approach was used in 7 patients while a trans-duodenal route was employed in the remaining 3. 1–year mortality following EUS-GBD was 20%. Stents were not removed in any patient in this series. No patient experienced stent-related adverse events, re-occurrence of cholecystitis, or the need for re-intervention. Conclusions: EUS-GBD has very high technical and clinical success rates, with low risk of complications and need for re-intervention in comparison to other options of GB decompression. It is, however, not widely available, and it requires a skilled endoscopist with experience in interventional EUS.