Procedures for Indoor Radon Measurement in Recent Years: A Scoping Review

Measuring indoor radon concentrations is essential for ensuring good air quality in buildings and protecting public health, but significant regulatory and methodological fragmentation still exists at the international level. This study analysed scientific articles published in the last five years, aiming to critically map the technical choices adopted in measuring radon in different indoor environments. The results show that regulatory fragmentation continues to generate inconsistent practices with regard to measurement protocols, sampling durations, devices used, and normative references used to interpret the results. In many cases, the protocols cannot be readily classified according to major technical standards as specific interpretation criteria are required, such as the sampling frequency and the overall duration of the strategy. These results highlight the importance of standardising measurement methods in order to improve the accuracy of exposure assessments and enable comparisons between studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15203725
Primary Topic
Radioactivity and Radon Measurements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Procedures for Indoor Radon Measurement in Recent Years: A Scoping Review

Paolo Maria Congedo, Cristina Baglivo, Silvia Tamborino
Buildings
Radioactivity and Radon Measurements
article

Procedures for Indoor Radon Measurement in Recent Years: A Scoping Review

Paolo Maria Congedo, Cristina Baglivo, Silvia Tamborino
article en

Abstract

Measuring indoor radon concentrations is essential for ensuring good air quality in buildings and protecting public health, but significant regulatory and methodological fragmentation still exists at the international level. This study analysed scientific articles published in the last five years, aiming to critically map the technical choices adopted in measuring radon in different indoor environments. The results show that regulatory fragmentation continues to generate inconsistent practices with regard to measurement protocols, sampling durations, devices used, and normative references used to interpret the results. In many cases, the protocols cannot be readily classified according to major technical standards as specific interpretation criteria are required, such as the sampling frequency and the overall duration of the strategy. These results highlight the importance of standardising measurement methods in order to improve the accuracy of exposure assessments and enable comparisons between studies.

BuildingsVol. 15(20)
University of Salento (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Radioactivity and Radon Measurements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Procedures for Indoor Radon Measurement in Recent Years: A Scoping Review — Paolo Maria Congedo, Cristina Baglivo, et al. · Buildings (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS