Comparative Performance of Green Roof Systems with Smart Cisterns: Balancing Stormwater Capture and Irrigation Supply

Using five years of field monitoring data, this study compares two types of roof systems that combine green roofs, cisterns, and real-time control (RTC) strategies: one optimized to reduce stormwater runoff (a fully vegetated roof with cisterns operating under a “smart detention” [SD] logic that fully empties within 24 h), and one designed to balance architectural, economic, and structural tradeoffs (a half vegetated, half bare roof with cisterns operating under a “rainwater harvesting” [RWH] logic that partially drains in anticipation of rainfall while maintaining a reserve for green roof irrigation). Both configurations demonstrated strong stormwater performance, with cisterns improving roof retention by 10.2 to 13.0% over five years. For small to medium storms (under 25 mm), representing 71.2% of events, both strategies prevented more than 95% of runoff, while forecast accuracy primarily influenced larger events. Even with modest cistern sizing, the SD system captured 96.7% and the RWH system 95.8% of runoff from small to medium storms, approaching 100% assuming perfect weather forecasts. Irrigation analysis showed that RWH cisterns supplied ~51% of irrigation demand, increasing to ~70% under perfect forecasts. This study is among the first to compare stormwater and irrigation outcomes from side-by-side RTC-managed roof systems over multiple years. The results underscore that the mixed green/bare roof with RWH logic provides nearly equivalent stormwater benefits while offering added value through irrigation supply, reduced structural loading, and design flexibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w17202987
Primary Topic
Urban Heat Island Mitigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Performance of Green Roof Systems with Smart Cisterns: Balancing Stormwater Capture and Irrigation Supply

Patricia J. Culligan, Robert M. Elliott, Nandan Shetty, Mark Wang
Water
Urban Heat Island Mitigation
article

Comparative Performance of Green Roof Systems with Smart Cisterns: Balancing Stormwater Capture and Irrigation Supply

Patricia J. Culligan, Robert M. Elliott, Nandan Shetty, Mark Wang
article en

Abstract

Using five years of field monitoring data, this study compares two types of roof systems that combine green roofs, cisterns, and real-time control (RTC) strategies: one optimized to reduce stormwater runoff (a fully vegetated roof with cisterns operating under a “smart detention” [SD] logic that fully empties within 24 h), and one designed to balance architectural, economic, and structural tradeoffs (a half vegetated, half bare roof with cisterns operating under a “rainwater harvesting” [RWH] logic that partially drains in anticipation of rainfall while maintaining a reserve for green roof irrigation). Both configurations demonstrated strong stormwater performance, with cisterns improving roof retention by 10.2 to 13.0% over five years. For small to medium storms (under 25 mm), representing 71.2% of events, both strategies prevented more than 95% of runoff, while forecast accuracy primarily influenced larger events. Even with modest cistern sizing, the SD system captured 96.7% and the RWH system 95.8% of runoff from small to medium storms, approaching 100% assuming perfect weather forecasts. Irrigation analysis showed that RWH cisterns supplied ~51% of irrigation demand, increasing to ~70% under perfect forecasts. This study is among the first to compare stormwater and irrigation outcomes from side-by-side RTC-managed roof systems over multiple years. The results underscore that the mixed green/bare roof with RWH logic provides nearly equivalent stormwater benefits while offering added value through irrigation supply, reduced structural loading, and design flexibility.

WaterVol. 17(20)
University of Notre Dame (US), Lafayette College (US), University of New Haven (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Urban Heat Island Mitigation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.