An ontological turn: being and becoming with digital technologies in education

In this conceptual paper, we explore how an ontological turn in the field of educational technology might contribute with an expansive perspective on digital technology. We base our argument on three perspectives on technology in education as we find them across existing research and frameworks: 1) Digital skills/competences perspective, 2) Pedagogical perspective, 3) Societal/humanistic perspective. In addition, we argue for an existing epistemological undercurrent running through research and frameworks. Through examples of a pressing influx of digital dilemmas, created particularly by generative artificial intelligence (AI), we continue to argue that AI’s inescapable presence leaves us with a series of dilemmas that are either ontological in nature or carry ontological implications. Our ontological perspective differs from ontology or ontological engineering as understood in computer science as we build our understanding of ontology on psychology and anthropology. Our use of AI is driven by desires for efficiency, dialog and learning without us really knowing how AI produces its output. The fact that AI can “think” for us, mimic us and even replicate us, highlights an ontological question: what does it really mean to be human in a world where we do not have full control over the technology we created? This gives rise to our argument that teacher education must expand the perspective on technology by making an ontological turn in how technology is addressed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Education
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2025.2572384
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Digital literacy in education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An ontological turn: being and becoming with digital technologies in education

Andreas Lund, Ann-Thérèse Arstorp
2 citations
Cogent Education
Digital literacy in education
6.49
article

An ontological turn: being and becoming with digital technologies in education

Andreas Lund, Ann-Thérèse Arstorp
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In this conceptual paper, we explore how an ontological turn in the field of educational technology might contribute with an expansive perspective on digital technology. We base our argument on three perspectives on technology in education as we find them across existing research and frameworks: 1) Digital skills/competences perspective, 2) Pedagogical perspective, 3) Societal/humanistic perspective. In addition, we argue for an existing epistemological undercurrent running through research and frameworks. Through examples of a pressing influx of digital dilemmas, created particularly by generative artificial intelligence (AI), we continue to argue that AI’s inescapable presence leaves us with a series of dilemmas that are either ontological in nature or carry ontological implications. Our ontological perspective differs from ontology or ontological engineering as understood in computer science as we build our understanding of ontology on psychology and anthropology. Our use of AI is driven by desires for efficiency, dialog and learning without us really knowing how AI produces its output. The fact that AI can “think” for us, mimic us and even replicate us, highlights an ontological question: what does it really mean to be human in a world where we do not have full control over the technology we created? This gives rise to our argument that teacher education must expand the perspective on technology by making an ontological turn in how technology is addressed.

Cogent EducationVol. 12(1)
University of Oslo (NO), University of South-Eastern Norway (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Digital literacy in education
6.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.