Alternative TMA-93 version demonstrates comparable performance and discriminative accuracy in early Alzheimer's disease

BackgroundThe TMA-93 is a brief memory test shown to be accurate for early Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis. Normative data are available, and biomarker-based cut-offs have been established.ObjectiveTo develop an alternative version of the TMA-93 and compare its performance with the original.MethodsWe prospectively recruited cognitively-unimpaired healthy controls (HC) and patients with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia who had available AD biomarkers, all aged ≥50 years or older. HC participants received either version A or B of the TMA-93 in alternating order. Patients were administered both versions in a counterbalanced design-one before and the other after biomarker testing (interval <4 months). We compared total scores between HC groups, assessed test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) in patients, and evaluated the discriminative performance of both versions in distinguishing biomarker-confirmed AD from sociodemographically matched HC.Results99 HC received version A (median age 68, 64.6% female) and 96 version B (median age 67, 62.5% female), with no sociodemographic differences. Test scores did not differ significantly between HC groups. Sixteen patients were biomarker-negative (median age 72, 37.5% female) and 51 were biomarker-positive (median age 74, 51% female). ICC showed good agreement overall (0.877; 95% CI: 0.800-0.924) and in the AD group (0.860; 95% CI: 0.755-0.920). Area under the curve for detecting AD was 0.95 for version A and 0.90 for version B, with no significant differences.ConclusionsThese findings support the equivalence of the new TMA-93 version B, facilitating its use in longitudinal evaluations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251386479
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Alternative TMA-93 version demonstrates comparable performance and discriminative accuracy in early Alzheimer's disease

Emilio Franco‐Macías, Alba Marta Marín-Cabañas, José Antonio Lojo-Ramírez, Ernesto García‐Roldán et al.
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Alternative TMA-93 version demonstrates comparable performance and discriminative accuracy in early Alzheimer's disease

Emilio Franco‐Macías, Alba Marta Marín-Cabañas, José Antonio Lojo-Ramírez, Ernesto García‐Roldán, Didier Maillet, José Enrique Arriola‐Infante, Andrea Luque‐Tirado, Ángela Almodóvar‐Sierra, María Bernal Sánchez‐Arjona, David García-Solís
article en

Abstract

BackgroundThe TMA-93 is a brief memory test shown to be accurate for early Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis. Normative data are available, and biomarker-based cut-offs have been established.ObjectiveTo develop an alternative version of the TMA-93 and compare its performance with the original.MethodsWe prospectively recruited cognitively-unimpaired healthy controls (HC) and patients with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia who had available AD biomarkers, all aged ≥50 years or older. HC participants received either version A or B of the TMA-93 in alternating order. Patients were administered both versions in a counterbalanced design-one before and the other after biomarker testing (interval <4 months). We compared total scores between HC groups, assessed test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) in patients, and evaluated the discriminative performance of both versions in distinguishing biomarker-confirmed AD from sociodemographically matched HC.Results99 HC received version A (median age 68, 64.6% female) and 96 version B (median age 67, 62.5% female), with no sociodemographic differences. Test scores did not differ significantly between HC groups. Sixteen patients were biomarker-negative (median age 72, 37.5% female) and 51 were biomarker-positive (median age 74, 51% female). ICC showed good agreement overall (0.877; 95% CI: 0.800-0.924) and in the AD group (0.860; 95% CI: 0.755-0.920). Area under the curve for detecting AD was 0.95 for version A and 0.90 for version B, with no significant differences.ConclusionsThese findings support the equivalence of the new TMA-93 version B, facilitating its use in longitudinal evaluations.

Journal of Alzheimer s DiseaseVol. 108(3)
Biomedical Research Networking Center on Neurodegenerative Diseases (ES), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Hôpital Saint-Louis (FR), Complejo Hospitalario Torrecárdenas (ES), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.