Five Degrees of Separation: Investigating the Unexpected Potential of Displaced Human-AI Collaboration Protocols for Apter AI Support

The integration of AI into decision-making processes offers substantial benefits, particularly in enhancing accuracy and efficiency. However, long-term consequences, such as over-reliance, skill erosion, and loss of human agency, present significant challenges. This study investigates various human-AI collaboration protocols~-~traditional, inhibition, displacement, and replacement~-~across multiple medical settings, including radiological imaging, ECG, and endoscopy. We introduce a novel framework that includes a choice nomogram and qualitative assessment tool, designed to optimize both decision accuracy and socio-technical impacts. Our findings reveal that the displacement protocol consistently outperformed others in several contexts, achieving 87% accuracy in MRI analysis, 89% in x-ray reading and 85% in endoscopy; conversely, the traditional protocol was most effective only in ECG analysis, with 82% accuracy. These results demonstrate that no single protocol is universally optimal, highlighting the need for context-specific selection to ensure effective and sustainable AI-supported decision-making, with a focus on balancing short-term performance with long-term human factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3757601
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Five Degrees of Separation: Investigating the Unexpected Potential of Displaced Human-AI Collaboration Protocols for Apter AI Support

Enrico Gallazzi, Federico Cabitza, Andrea Campagner, Gian Eugenio Tontini et al.
2 citations
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
4.88
article

Five Degrees of Separation: Investigating the Unexpected Potential of Displaced Human-AI Collaboration Protocols for Apter AI Support

Enrico Gallazzi, Federico Cabitza, Andrea Campagner, Gian Eugenio Tontini, Luca Maria Sconfienza, Matteo Cameli, Caterina Fregosi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The integration of AI into decision-making processes offers substantial benefits, particularly in enhancing accuracy and efficiency. However, long-term consequences, such as over-reliance, skill erosion, and loss of human agency, present significant challenges. This study investigates various human-AI collaboration protocols~-~traditional, inhibition, displacement, and replacement~-~across multiple medical settings, including radiological imaging, ECG, and endoscopy. We introduce a novel framework that includes a choice nomogram and qualitative assessment tool, designed to optimize both decision accuracy and socio-technical impacts. Our findings reveal that the displacement protocol consistently outperformed others in several contexts, achieving 87% accuracy in MRI analysis, 89% in x-ray reading and 85% in endoscopy; conversely, the traditional protocol was most effective only in ECG analysis, with 82% accuracy. These results demonstrate that no single protocol is universally optimal, highlighting the need for context-specific selection to ensure effective and sustainable AI-supported decision-making, with a focus on balancing short-term performance with long-term human factors.

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer InteractionVol. 9(7)
University of Siena (IT), Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT), Ospedale Maggiore (IT), Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio (IT), Istituto Ortopedico Gaetano Pini (IT), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
4.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.