Dynamic Surveys: Using LLMs to Blend Qualitative Depth, Quantitative Structure, and Collaborative Interaction

Surveys are a powerful tool for collecting data and eliciting insights on social phenomena, and are critical in product design, marketing, scientific research, and other domains. However, traditional open-ended and closed-ended question formats limit researchers' ability to capture data that combines both the richness of qualitative insights and the analytical rigor of quantitative data. Closed-ended questions facilitate structured data collection that is amenable to statistical analysis but limit respondents' answers. In contrast, open-ended questions allow for nuanced responses incorporating new perspectives but require significant effort to interpret due to their unstructured nature. Moreover, traditional survey tools lack mechanisms to prompt respondents for deeper reflections or to facilitate engagement with others' perspectives, limiting the potential for richer insights. To address these problems, we propose Dynamic Surveys, a survey platform that uses Large Language Models (LLMs) to dynamically cluster qualitative responses in real time and to elicit quantitative ratings and rankings on those clusters and qualitative reflections on how their views compare to broader respondent trends, especially helpful in early-stage or exploratory research settings. This process generates a report showing survey creators and respondents the clustered responses as well as each cluster's rank, rating distribution, and follow-up reflections. To evaluate Dynamic Surveys, we conducted two field studies with 93 participants over a 2-month period. In the first study, 52 students provided input for a career workshop, while in the second, 41 students gave feedback on gaps in their academic curriculum. Of these, 44 respondents filled out a survey on their experience using Dynamic Surveys. We also shared the generated report with 4 individuals who were interested in the insights for their work, and interviewed them to understand their perspectives on the results and any contextual risks they saw in the platform design. Our findings suggest that Dynamic Surveys not only provide richer and deeper insights into responses compared with traditional survey tools, but also increase engagement and foster a sense of community. We discuss broader implications for the design of survey platforms that blend qualitative depth with quantitative structure, facilitating richer insights and offering more collaborative interactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3757586
Primary Topic
Sports Analytics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic Surveys: Using LLMs to Blend Qualitative Depth, Quantitative Structure, and Collaborative Interaction

Kehua Lei, Zili Wang, David Lee, Aidan Ladenburg et al.
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Sports Analytics and Performance
article

Dynamic Surveys: Using LLMs to Blend Qualitative Depth, Quantitative Structure, and Collaborative Interaction

Kehua Lei, Zili Wang, David Lee, Aidan Ladenburg, Zahra Kais Petiwala, Dishita Jhawar, Ipsita Bisht
article en

Abstract

Surveys are a powerful tool for collecting data and eliciting insights on social phenomena, and are critical in product design, marketing, scientific research, and other domains. However, traditional open-ended and closed-ended question formats limit researchers' ability to capture data that combines both the richness of qualitative insights and the analytical rigor of quantitative data. Closed-ended questions facilitate structured data collection that is amenable to statistical analysis but limit respondents' answers. In contrast, open-ended questions allow for nuanced responses incorporating new perspectives but require significant effort to interpret due to their unstructured nature. Moreover, traditional survey tools lack mechanisms to prompt respondents for deeper reflections or to facilitate engagement with others' perspectives, limiting the potential for richer insights. To address these problems, we propose Dynamic Surveys, a survey platform that uses Large Language Models (LLMs) to dynamically cluster qualitative responses in real time and to elicit quantitative ratings and rankings on those clusters and qualitative reflections on how their views compare to broader respondent trends, especially helpful in early-stage or exploratory research settings. This process generates a report showing survey creators and respondents the clustered responses as well as each cluster's rank, rating distribution, and follow-up reflections. To evaluate Dynamic Surveys, we conducted two field studies with 93 participants over a 2-month period. In the first study, 52 students provided input for a career workshop, while in the second, 41 students gave feedback on gaps in their academic curriculum. Of these, 44 respondents filled out a survey on their experience using Dynamic Surveys. We also shared the generated report with 4 individuals who were interested in the insights for their work, and interviewed them to understand their perspectives on the results and any contextual risks they saw in the platform design. Our findings suggest that Dynamic Surveys not only provide richer and deeper insights into responses compared with traditional survey tools, but also increase engagement and foster a sense of community. We discuss broader implications for the design of survey platforms that blend qualitative depth with quantitative structure, facilitating richer insights and offering more collaborative interactions.

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer InteractionVol. 9(7)
University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Sports Analytics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.