Double Incomes, Single Calendar: Reimagining Shared Scheduling for Modern Families

Coordinating schedules in double-income households is an ongoing challenge, as traditional calendar tools often fail to meet the needs of families juggling professional and domestic responsibilities. This mixed-methods study investigates the barriers to adopting shared digital calendars and explores how guided onboarding and participatory design can improve their effectiveness for family use. We conducted surveys with 277 participants, interviews with 40 individuals, a one-month calendar adoption intervention with 30 couples, and a design workshop with 12 couples. Our findings reveal persistent obstacles-including privacy concerns, uneven engagement, and limited customization-as well as the potential of targeted support and user-driven design to overcome them. Participants expressed a desire for more flexible privacy controls, role-sensitive features, and smarter coordination support. Thematic analysis across all phases highlights how families negotiate boundaries, share invisible scheduling labor, and creatively adapt tools to fit their routines. We conclude with implications for designing family-centric coordination technologies that balance structure, agency, and trust in everyday scheduling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3757584
Primary Topic
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Double Incomes, Single Calendar: Reimagining Shared Scheduling for Modern Families

Zhao Zhao
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
article

Double Incomes, Single Calendar: Reimagining Shared Scheduling for Modern Families

Zhao Zhao
article en

Abstract

Coordinating schedules in double-income households is an ongoing challenge, as traditional calendar tools often fail to meet the needs of families juggling professional and domestic responsibilities. This mixed-methods study investigates the barriers to adopting shared digital calendars and explores how guided onboarding and participatory design can improve their effectiveness for family use. We conducted surveys with 277 participants, interviews with 40 individuals, a one-month calendar adoption intervention with 30 couples, and a design workshop with 12 couples. Our findings reveal persistent obstacles-including privacy concerns, uneven engagement, and limited customization-as well as the potential of targeted support and user-driven design to overcome them. Participants expressed a desire for more flexible privacy controls, role-sensitive features, and smarter coordination support. Thematic analysis across all phases highlights how families negotiate boundaries, share invisible scheduling labor, and creatively adapt tools to fit their routines. We conclude with implications for designing family-centric coordination technologies that balance structure, agency, and trust in everyday scheduling.

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer InteractionVol. 9(7)
University of Guelph (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.