Designing Value-Centered Consent Interfaces: A Mixed-Methods Approach to Support Patient Values in Data-Sharing Decisions

In the digital health domain, ethical data collection practices are crucial for ensuring the availability of quality datasets that drive medical advancement. Data donation, allowing patients to share their medical data for secondary research purposes, presents a promising resource for such datasets. Yet, current consent user interfaces mediating data-sharing decisions are found to favor data collectors' values over those of data subjects. Seeking to establish value-centered data collection practices in digital health, we investigate the design of consent user interfaces that support end-users in making value-congruent data-sharing decisions. Focusing our research efforts on the situated context of health data donation at the psychosomatic unit of a university hospital, we demonstrate how a human-centered design can ground technology within the perspective of a vulnerable group. We employed an exploratory sequential mixed-method approach consisting of five phases: (1) Participatory workshops elicit patient values, informing the (2) design of a proposed Value-Centered Consent Interface . An (3) online experiment demonstrates our interface element's effect, increasing value congruence in data-sharing decisions. Our proposed consent user interface design is then adapted to the research context through a (4) co-creation workshop with domain experts and (5) a user interface evaluation with patients. Our work contributes to recent discourse in CSCW concerning ethical implications of new data practices within their socio-technological context by exploring patient values on medical data-sharing, introducing a novel consent interface leveraging reflection to support value-congruent decision-making, and providing a situated evaluation of the proposed consent user interface with patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3757466
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Designing Value-Centered Consent Interfaces: A Mixed-Methods Approach to Support Patient Values in Data-Sharing Decisions

Peter Sörries, Claudia Müller-Birn, David Leimstädtner
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Designing Value-Centered Consent Interfaces: A Mixed-Methods Approach to Support Patient Values in Data-Sharing Decisions

Peter Sörries, Claudia Müller-Birn, David Leimstädtner
article en

Abstract

In the digital health domain, ethical data collection practices are crucial for ensuring the availability of quality datasets that drive medical advancement. Data donation, allowing patients to share their medical data for secondary research purposes, presents a promising resource for such datasets. Yet, current consent user interfaces mediating data-sharing decisions are found to favor data collectors' values over those of data subjects. Seeking to establish value-centered data collection practices in digital health, we investigate the design of consent user interfaces that support end-users in making value-congruent data-sharing decisions. Focusing our research efforts on the situated context of health data donation at the psychosomatic unit of a university hospital, we demonstrate how a human-centered design can ground technology within the perspective of a vulnerable group. We employed an exploratory sequential mixed-method approach consisting of five phases: (1) Participatory workshops elicit patient values, informing the (2) design of a proposed Value-Centered Consent Interface . An (3) online experiment demonstrates our interface element's effect, increasing value congruence in data-sharing decisions. Our proposed consent user interface design is then adapted to the research context through a (4) co-creation workshop with domain experts and (5) a user interface evaluation with patients. Our work contributes to recent discourse in CSCW concerning ethical implications of new data practices within their socio-technological context by exploring patient values on medical data-sharing, introducing a novel consent interface leveraging reflection to support value-congruent decision-making, and providing a situated evaluation of the proposed consent user interface with patients.

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer InteractionVol. 9(7)
Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Designing Value-Centered Consent Interfaces: A Mixed-Methods Approach to Support Patient Values in Data-Sharing Decisions — Peter Sörries, Claudia Müller-Birn, et al. · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS