Impact Assessment Card: Communicating Risks and Benefits of AI Uses

Communicating the risks and benefits of AI is important for regulation and public understanding. Yet current methods such as technical reports often exclude people without technical expertise. Drawing on HCI research, we developed an Impact Assessment Card to present this information more clearly. We held three focus groups with a total of 12 participants who helped identify design requirements and create early versions of the card. We then tested a refined version in an online study with 235 participants, including AI developers, compliance experts, and members of the public selected to reflect the U.S. population by age, sex, and race. Participants used either the card or a full impact assessment report to write an email supporting or opposing a proposed AI system. The card led to faster task completion and higher-quality emails across all groups. We discuss how design choices can improve accessibility and support AI governance. Examples of cards are available at: https://social-dynamics.net/ai-risks/impact-card/

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3757482
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact Assessment Card: Communicating Risks and Benefits of AI Uses

Marios Constantinides, Edyta P. Bogucka, Sanja Šćepanović, Daniele Quercia
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Impact Assessment Card: Communicating Risks and Benefits of AI Uses

Marios Constantinides, Edyta P. Bogucka, Sanja Šćepanović, Daniele Quercia
article en

Abstract

Communicating the risks and benefits of AI is important for regulation and public understanding. Yet current methods such as technical reports often exclude people without technical expertise. Drawing on HCI research, we developed an Impact Assessment Card to present this information more clearly. We held three focus groups with a total of 12 participants who helped identify design requirements and create early versions of the card. We then tested a refined version in an online study with 235 participants, including AI developers, compliance experts, and members of the public selected to reflect the U.S. population by age, sex, and race. Participants used either the card or a full impact assessment report to write an email supporting or opposing a proposed AI system. The card led to faster task completion and higher-quality emails across all groups. We discuss how design choices can improve accessibility and support AI governance. Examples of cards are available at: https://social-dynamics.net/ai-risks/impact-card/

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer InteractionVol. 9(7)
Politecnico di Torino (IT), Nokia (United Kingdom) (GB), Cyprus Research and Innovation Center (Cyprus) (CY), Cambridgeshire County Council (GB), Science Oxford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Impact Assessment Card: Communicating Risks and Benefits of AI Uses — Marios Constantinides, Edyta P. Bogucka, et al. · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS