Evaluation of nanopore sequencing for increasing accessibility of eDNA studies in biodiverse countries

Biodiversity loss is a global challenge of the 21st century. Environmental DNA (eDNA)-based metabarcoding offers a cost- and time-efficient alternative to conventional biodiversity surveys, enabling detection of rare, cryptic, and elusive species from environmental samples. However, limited access to genomic technologies restricts the application of eDNA metabarcoding in highly biodiverse remote regions and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Here, we directly compared the latest portable nanopore sequencing methods with established Illumina sequencing for vertebrate eDNA metabarcoding of Zambian water samples. Our results show that due to recent improvements in sequencing chemistry and optimized basecalling, nanopore sequencing data can recapitulate or even surpass established protocols, demonstrating the feasibility of in situ biodiversity assessments. eDNA- and camera trap-based species detections had minimal overlap in species detections, suggesting a complementary rather than substituting application of these biodiversity monitoring technologies. We finally demonstrate that our entire eDNA workflow can be successfully implemented in a mobile laboratory under remote field conditions by completing all steps-from sample collection to data analysis-within the Luambe National Park in Zambia. This approach has important implications for capacity building in LMICs and for overcoming limitations associated with sample export.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333994
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of nanopore sequencing for increasing accessibility of eDNA studies in biodiverse countries

Reindert Nijland, Sabina Ramirez‐Hincapie, Amrita Srivathsan, Twakundine Simpamba et al.
PLoS ONE
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
article

Evaluation of nanopore sequencing for increasing accessibility of eDNA studies in biodiverse countries

Reindert Nijland, Sabina Ramirez‐Hincapie, Amrita Srivathsan, Twakundine Simpamba, Lara Urban, Moses Chibesa, Daniel Gygax, Michael Riffel, Tom Riffel
article en

Abstract

Biodiversity loss is a global challenge of the 21st century. Environmental DNA (eDNA)-based metabarcoding offers a cost- and time-efficient alternative to conventional biodiversity surveys, enabling detection of rare, cryptic, and elusive species from environmental samples. However, limited access to genomic technologies restricts the application of eDNA metabarcoding in highly biodiverse remote regions and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Here, we directly compared the latest portable nanopore sequencing methods with established Illumina sequencing for vertebrate eDNA metabarcoding of Zambian water samples. Our results show that due to recent improvements in sequencing chemistry and optimized basecalling, nanopore sequencing data can recapitulate or even surpass established protocols, demonstrating the feasibility of in situ biodiversity assessments. eDNA- and camera trap-based species detections had minimal overlap in species detections, suggesting a complementary rather than substituting application of these biodiversity monitoring technologies. We finally demonstrate that our entire eDNA workflow can be successfully implemented in a mobile laboratory under remote field conditions by completing all steps-from sample collection to data analysis-within the Luambe National Park in Zambia. This approach has important implications for capacity building in LMICs and for overcoming limitations associated with sample export.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(10)
Museum für Naturkunde (DE), University of Zurich (CH), X-Fab (Germany) (DE), Helmholtz Zentrum München (DE), Copperbelt University (ZM), Golden Valley Agricultural Research Trust (ZM), Technical University of Munich (DE), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.