WeAudit: Scaffolding User Auditors and AI Practitioners in Auditing Generative AI

There has been growing interest from both practitioners and researchers in engaging end users in AI auditing, to draw upon users' unique knowledge and lived experiences. However, we know little about how to effectively scaffold end users in auditing in ways that can generate actionable insights for AI practitioners. Through formative studies with both users and AI practitioners, we first identified a set of design goals to support user-engaged AI auditing. We then developed WeAudit, a workflow and system that supports end users in auditing AI both individually and collectively. We evaluated WeAudit through a three-week user study with user auditors and interviews with industry Generative AI practitioners. Our findings offer insights into how WeAudit supports users in noticing and reflecting upon potential AI harms and in articulating their findings in ways that industry practitioners can act upon. Based on our observations and feedback from both users and practitioners, we identify several opportunities to better support user engagement in AI auditing processes. We discuss implications for future research to support effective and responsible user engagement in AI auditing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3757702
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

WeAudit: Scaffolding User Auditors and AI Practitioners in Auditing Generative AI

Kenneth Holstein, Howard Ziyu Han, Motahhare Eslami, Wesley Hanwen Deng et al.
1 citations
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
1.69
article

WeAudit: Scaffolding User Auditors and AI Practitioners in Auditing Generative AI

Kenneth Holstein, Howard Ziyu Han, Motahhare Eslami, Wesley Hanwen Deng, Jason Hong, Wang Claire
article en
1 citations

Abstract

There has been growing interest from both practitioners and researchers in engaging end users in AI auditing, to draw upon users' unique knowledge and lived experiences. However, we know little about how to effectively scaffold end users in auditing in ways that can generate actionable insights for AI practitioners. Through formative studies with both users and AI practitioners, we first identified a set of design goals to support user-engaged AI auditing. We then developed WeAudit, a workflow and system that supports end users in auditing AI both individually and collectively. We evaluated WeAudit through a three-week user study with user auditors and interviews with industry Generative AI practitioners. Our findings offer insights into how WeAudit supports users in noticing and reflecting upon potential AI harms and in articulating their findings in ways that industry practitioners can act upon. Based on our observations and feedback from both users and practitioners, we identify several opportunities to better support user engagement in AI auditing processes. We discuss implications for future research to support effective and responsible user engagement in AI auditing.

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer InteractionVol. 9(7)
Carnegie Mellon University (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
1.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

WeAudit: Scaffolding User Auditors and AI Practitioners in Auditing Generative AI — Kenneth Holstein, Howard Ziyu Han, et al. · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS