Integrating machine learning into life cycle assessment: Review and future outlook

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is widely used to quantify environmental impacts but often faces data gaps, heterogeneous practices, and limited timeliness. This review examines how machine learning (ML) can strengthen LCA across all four phases—goal & scope, life cycle inventory (LCI), life cycle impact assessment (LCIA), and interpretation—while providing a reproducible bibliometric map of recent research. We performed a bibliometric search and keyword co-occurrence visualization (VOSviewer) and organized the literature by LCA phases. We highlight actionable opportunities: NLP-assisted scope definition, probabilistic imputation and uncertainty quantification for LCI, surrogate and hybrid models for LCIA, and calibrated, decision-oriented interpretation. Compared with prior reviews, we (i) deliver phase-specific guidance instead of generic lists, (ii) extend coverage to recent work with reproducible bibliometrics, and (iii) foreground early-phase opportunities that remain under-explored. These insights—together with open materials for reuse—aim to make LCA more data-robust, transparent, and actionable in research and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Climate
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000732
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating machine learning into life cycle assessment: Review and future outlook

Hairong Wang
PLOS Climate
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
article

Integrating machine learning into life cycle assessment: Review and future outlook

Hairong Wang
article en

Abstract

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is widely used to quantify environmental impacts but often faces data gaps, heterogeneous practices, and limited timeliness. This review examines how machine learning (ML) can strengthen LCA across all four phases—goal & scope, life cycle inventory (LCI), life cycle impact assessment (LCIA), and interpretation—while providing a reproducible bibliometric map of recent research. We performed a bibliometric search and keyword co-occurrence visualization (VOSviewer) and organized the literature by LCA phases. We highlight actionable opportunities: NLP-assisted scope definition, probabilistic imputation and uncertainty quantification for LCI, surrogate and hybrid models for LCIA, and calibrated, decision-oriented interpretation. Compared with prior reviews, we (i) deliver phase-specific guidance instead of generic lists, (ii) extend coverage to recent work with reproducible bibliometrics, and (iii) foreground early-phase opportunities that remain under-explored. These insights—together with open materials for reuse—aim to make LCA more data-robust, transparent, and actionable in research and practice.

PLOS ClimateVol. 4(10)
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.