When Do Local Governments Discriminate? Lessons from the Diffusion of “LGBT Free Zones” in Poland

Between 2019 and 2020, amidst national-level democratic backsliding under the conservative Law and Justice (PiS) party, a wave of Polish municipal governments adopted a template of discriminatory policies, creating so-called “LGBT Free Zones” and countering a growing trend of “human rights cities.” What factors might explain this discriminatory diffusion? Drawing on three research traditions regarding diffusion—the social movement literature on direct/indirect linkages between individuals, an intergovernmentalist perspective on the kinds of relations between governmental units, and the Europeanization literature—we explain variation in the enactment of “zones” across 2,477 municipalities using a multinomial logit model. We find that local “zones” are most likely implemented, first, where direct channels link local elected officials to PiS's party network and, second, where higher-level units (counties) also implement “zones,” indicating that government-to-government networks also catalyze diffusion. Finally, we find diffusion less likely among geographic neighbors insofar as municipalities perceive enacting “zones” as costly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Affairs Review
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874251382453
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When Do Local Governments Discriminate? Lessons from the Diffusion of “LGBT Free Zones” in Poland

Conor O’Dwyer, Matthew Stenberg
Urban Affairs Review
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

When Do Local Governments Discriminate? Lessons from the Diffusion of “LGBT Free Zones” in Poland

Conor O’Dwyer, Matthew Stenberg
article en

Abstract

Between 2019 and 2020, amidst national-level democratic backsliding under the conservative Law and Justice (PiS) party, a wave of Polish municipal governments adopted a template of discriminatory policies, creating so-called “LGBT Free Zones” and countering a growing trend of “human rights cities.” What factors might explain this discriminatory diffusion? Drawing on three research traditions regarding diffusion—the social movement literature on direct/indirect linkages between individuals, an intergovernmentalist perspective on the kinds of relations between governmental units, and the Europeanization literature—we explain variation in the enactment of “zones” across 2,477 municipalities using a multinomial logit model. We find that local “zones” are most likely implemented, first, where direct channels link local elected officials to PiS's party network and, second, where higher-level units (counties) also implement “zones,” indicating that government-to-government networks also catalyze diffusion. Finally, we find diffusion less likely among geographic neighbors insofar as municipalities perceive enacting “zones” as costly.

Urban Affairs Review
University of California System (US), University of Florida (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

When Do Local Governments Discriminate? Lessons from the Diffusion of “LGBT Free Zones” in Poland — Conor O’Dwyer, Matthew Stenberg · Urban Affairs Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS