Evaluating deep uncertainty tools for complex decision problems

Decision-making methods have been developed to support planning under deep uncertainty, but their suitability for complex decision problems has not been systematically assessed. We define complex decision problems as those in which decision-makers must navigate multiple interacting uncertain conditions and evaluate how interventions perform across these conditions, including potential synergies, trade-offs, and unintended consequences. This paper proposes two structural criteria for addressing such problems and evaluates a representative set of Decision Making under Deep Uncertainty (DMDU) methods against them, using a stylised case to assess each method’s capabilities. The results extend the established taxonomy of DMDU methods to include complexity of the decision problem as an explicit evaluative dimension and add classifications for two additional methods. The updated taxonomy provides decision-makers with a clearer basis for selecting or adapting tools to address the increasingly complex and uncertain decision problems they face. • Sets out the requirements that a decision support tool must meet to address complex decision problems. • Adds DAPP-MR and Scenario Planning to the DMDU taxonomy of approaches and tools. • Investigates which DMDU methods adequately account for complex decision problems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Policy
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104225
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating deep uncertainty tools for complex decision problems

Tom Logan, Charlotte Brown, Anita Wreford, Andrew P. Robinson et al.
Environmental Science & Policy
Risk and Safety Analysis
article

Evaluating deep uncertainty tools for complex decision problems

Tom Logan, Charlotte Brown, Anita Wreford, Andrew P. Robinson, Patrick M. Curran
article en

Abstract

Decision-making methods have been developed to support planning under deep uncertainty, but their suitability for complex decision problems has not been systematically assessed. We define complex decision problems as those in which decision-makers must navigate multiple interacting uncertain conditions and evaluate how interventions perform across these conditions, including potential synergies, trade-offs, and unintended consequences. This paper proposes two structural criteria for addressing such problems and evaluates a representative set of Decision Making under Deep Uncertainty (DMDU) methods against them, using a stylised case to assess each method’s capabilities. The results extend the established taxonomy of DMDU methods to include complexity of the decision problem as an explicit evaluative dimension and add classifications for two additional methods. The updated taxonomy provides decision-makers with a clearer basis for selecting or adapting tools to address the increasingly complex and uncertain decision problems they face. • Sets out the requirements that a decision support tool must meet to address complex decision problems. • Adds DAPP-MR and Scenario Planning to the DMDU taxonomy of approaches and tools. • Investigates which DMDU methods adequately account for complex decision problems.

Environmental Science & PolicyVol. 173
The University of Melbourne (AU), Lincoln University (NZ), University of Canterbury (NZ), Christchurch Clinical Studies Trust (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Risk and Safety Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.