Uncertainty-aware automated labeling of intracranial arteries using deep learning

Accurate anatomical labeling of intracranial arteries is critical for cerebrovascular diagnosis and hemodynamic analysis, but remains time-consuming and prone to inter-operator variability. While deep learning provides an automated solution, its clinical adoption is limited by the lack of confidence measures. Incorporating uncertainty quantification into automated labeling could enhance interpretability by identifying ambiguous or abnormal regions and support clinical trust, yet this aspect remains underexplored. To address this gap, we introduce an uncertainty-aware deep learning framework for automated artery labeling from 3D Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography (3D ToF-MRA) segmentations (n = 35). Three convolutional neural network architectures were evaluated: (1) UNet with residual encoder blocks, (2) CS-Net, an attention-augmented UNet with spatial attention, and (3) nnUNet, a self-configuring framework that adapts architecture and training to dataset characteristics. Confidence was modeled via test-time augmentation (TTA) combined with a novel coordinate-guided strategy to reduce interpolation errors during inference. Generalizability was assessed by evaluating a subset of the public TubeTK ToF-MRA dataset (n = 20). Voxelwise uncertainty maps highlighted anatomical ambiguities, pathological variations, and inconsistencies in manual references, providing intuitive confidence indicators. nnUNet achieved the highest performance (average Dice score 0.93; clDice 0.94; average surface distance 0.35 mm; 95th percentile of Hausdorff distance 4.51 mm), demonstrating robustness in complex vascular regions. On the TubeTK dataset, nnUNet maintained robust generalization (average Dice score 0.87; clDice 0.87; average surface distance 0.42 mm; 95th percentile of Hausdorff distance 5.85 mm). Validation against co-registered 4D flow MRI showed close agreement between flow velocities derived from automated and manual labels, with no significant differences. The proposed framework delivers a scalable, accurate, and uncertainty-aware solution for intracranial artery labeling. By integrating uncertainty quantification, it offers a transparent and clinically trustworthy tool to facilitate cerebrovascular imaging workflows and support subsequent hemodynamic analyses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Imaging
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02276-5
Primary Topic
Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncertainty-aware automated labeling of intracranial arteries using deep learning

Sameer A. Ansari, Sergio A. Uribe, Cristián Tejos, Michael Markl et al.
BMC Medical Imaging
Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
article

Uncertainty-aware automated labeling of intracranial arteries using deep learning

Sameer A. Ansari, Sergio A. Uribe, Cristián Tejos, Michael Markl, Julio A Sotelo, R Abdalla, Susanne Schnell, Javier Bisbal, Patrick Winter, Oliver Welin Odeback, David Marlevi, Aaron Ponce, Sebastian Jofré
article en

Abstract

Accurate anatomical labeling of intracranial arteries is critical for cerebrovascular diagnosis and hemodynamic analysis, but remains time-consuming and prone to inter-operator variability. While deep learning provides an automated solution, its clinical adoption is limited by the lack of confidence measures. Incorporating uncertainty quantification into automated labeling could enhance interpretability by identifying ambiguous or abnormal regions and support clinical trust, yet this aspect remains underexplored. To address this gap, we introduce an uncertainty-aware deep learning framework for automated artery labeling from 3D Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography (3D ToF-MRA) segmentations (n = 35). Three convolutional neural network architectures were evaluated: (1) UNet with residual encoder blocks, (2) CS-Net, an attention-augmented UNet with spatial attention, and (3) nnUNet, a self-configuring framework that adapts architecture and training to dataset characteristics. Confidence was modeled via test-time augmentation (TTA) combined with a novel coordinate-guided strategy to reduce interpolation errors during inference. Generalizability was assessed by evaluating a subset of the public TubeTK ToF-MRA dataset (n = 20). Voxelwise uncertainty maps highlighted anatomical ambiguities, pathological variations, and inconsistencies in manual references, providing intuitive confidence indicators. nnUNet achieved the highest performance (average Dice score 0.93; clDice 0.94; average surface distance 0.35 mm; 95th percentile of Hausdorff distance 4.51 mm), demonstrating robustness in complex vascular regions. On the TubeTK dataset, nnUNet maintained robust generalization (average Dice score 0.87; clDice 0.87; average surface distance 0.42 mm; 95th percentile of Hausdorff distance 5.85 mm). Validation against co-registered 4D flow MRI showed close agreement between flow velocities derived from automated and manual labels, with no significant differences. The proposed framework delivers a scalable, accurate, and uncertainty-aware solution for intracranial artery labeling. By integrating uncertainty quantification, it offers a transparent and clinically trustworthy tool to facilitate cerebrovascular imaging workflows and support subsequent hemodynamic analyses.

BMC Medical Imaging
Northwestern University (US), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL), Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (DE), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Universität Greifswald (DE), Neurological Surgery (US), Millennium Institute for Integrative Biology (CL), Monash University (AU), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), Federico Santa María Technical University (CL), University of Valparaíso (CL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.