Individual differences in sensitivity to texture as drivers of food preferences and eating behaviour

Food texture significantly influences food perception and its acceptance or rejection, yet it remains relatively understudied. Research links texture to overeating, with dietary and health implications. Softer textures, often found in highly processed foods (HPFs), may promote faster consumption and potential overeating. However, how this affects different consumer groups is not well understood. This study explored how consumer preferences for food textures relate to eating behaviour and food choices, focusing on HPF consumption. An online questionnaire completed by 500 Norwegian adults assessed appetitive traits, food choice motives, sensory modalities underlying food preferences and rejection, and specific textural attributes using a Check-All-That-Apply question. Additional measures included sensitivity to texture—defined here as the behavioural dimension of individuals' emotionally and motivationally respond to the physical feel of food in the mouth, distinct from tactile acuity—self-reported eating rate, and dietary patterns using a short-screening tool for HPF consumption, integrating four classification systems. Hierarchical clustering was used based on sensitivity to texture. Two consumer segments emerged, differing in behavioural profiles, sensory drivers of acceptance and rejection, and reported intake of HPFs. Individuals with higher sensitivity to texture appeared more selective in their food choices and reported higher consumption of HPFs, influenced by multiple behavioural and perceptual factors. Based on these findings, a conceptual framework is proposed that defines sensitivity to texture as a multidimensional trait and explores its potential role in shaping food acceptance, satiety regulation, and HPF consumption. Results support food texture's influence on dietary patterns across consumer segments. • 500 consumers completed a questionnaire assessing sensitivity to texture, food preferences and eating behaviour. • Two consumer segments emerged based on their behaviour towards texture: “Texture Picky” and “Texture Explorers”. • These groups differed in sensory drivers of food preferences and in their consumption of highly processed foods. • Texture Picky consumers reported more restrictive eating patterns and a higher intake of processed foods. • Sensitivity to texture was linked to emotional and picky eating, suggesting broader implications for dietary habits and food preferences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Quality and Preference
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105752
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Individual differences in sensitivity to texture as drivers of food preferences and eating behaviour

Paula Varela, Aikaterini Katsikari
2 citations
Food Quality and Preference
Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
2.32
article

Individual differences in sensitivity to texture as drivers of food preferences and eating behaviour

Paula Varela, Aikaterini Katsikari
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Food texture significantly influences food perception and its acceptance or rejection, yet it remains relatively understudied. Research links texture to overeating, with dietary and health implications. Softer textures, often found in highly processed foods (HPFs), may promote faster consumption and potential overeating. However, how this affects different consumer groups is not well understood. This study explored how consumer preferences for food textures relate to eating behaviour and food choices, focusing on HPF consumption. An online questionnaire completed by 500 Norwegian adults assessed appetitive traits, food choice motives, sensory modalities underlying food preferences and rejection, and specific textural attributes using a Check-All-That-Apply question. Additional measures included sensitivity to texture—defined here as the behavioural dimension of individuals' emotionally and motivationally respond to the physical feel of food in the mouth, distinct from tactile acuity—self-reported eating rate, and dietary patterns using a short-screening tool for HPF consumption, integrating four classification systems. Hierarchical clustering was used based on sensitivity to texture. Two consumer segments emerged, differing in behavioural profiles, sensory drivers of acceptance and rejection, and reported intake of HPFs. Individuals with higher sensitivity to texture appeared more selective in their food choices and reported higher consumption of HPFs, influenced by multiple behavioural and perceptual factors. Based on these findings, a conceptual framework is proposed that defines sensitivity to texture as a multidimensional trait and explores its potential role in shaping food acceptance, satiety regulation, and HPF consumption. Results support food texture's influence on dietary patterns across consumer segments. • 500 consumers completed a questionnaire assessing sensitivity to texture, food preferences and eating behaviour. • Two consumer segments emerged based on their behaviour towards texture: “Texture Picky” and “Texture Explorers”. • These groups differed in sensory drivers of food preferences and in their consumption of highly processed foods. • Texture Picky consumers reported more restrictive eating patterns and a higher intake of processed foods. • Sensitivity to texture was linked to emotional and picky eating, suggesting broader implications for dietary habits and food preferences.

Food Quality and PreferenceVol. 136
Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO), Fafo Foundation (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
2.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.