The land use-climate change-biodiversity nexus in the perceptions of European islands stakeholders

To promote climate adaptation and mitigation strategies, it is crucial to understand the perspectives and knowledge gaps of stakeholders involved in functions affected by or addressing land use and climate changes. A large number of stakeholders across 21 European islands were consulted regarding their views on climate change and land use change issues affecting ecosystem services on their island. Climate change characteristics perceptions included variables such as temperature, precipitation, humidity, extremes, and wind. Land use change characteristics perceptions included deforestation, coastal degradation, habitat protection, renewable energy facilities, wetlands and other variables. Other environmental and societal problem perceptions such as invasive species, water or energy scarcity, problems in infrastructures or austerity were also included. Climate and land use change impact perceptions were analysed with machine learning to quantify their importance on the perception outcome. For example if a stakeholder perceives that pollution, coastal degradation, deforestation, precipitation decrease, and increase of humidity are occurring on the island, and austerity is the biggest problem how likely is that the impact of climate change or land use change will be quantified by the stakeholder as negative, unclear, neutral, or positive? The predominant climatic change characteristic is related with temperature, and the predominant land use change characteristic with deforestation. Water-related problems are top priorities for stakeholders. Energy-related problems, such as energy deficiency but also wind and solar energy facilities problems, rank high as combined climate change and land use change risks. Stakeholders generally perceive climate change impacts on ecosystem services as negative, with natural habitat destruction and biodiversity loss identified as the top variables. Land use change impacts are also negative but also more complex to explain, with a higher number of explanatory variables associated with the impact outcome. Stakeholders have common perceptions regarding climate change and land use change impacts on the benefits of biodiversity despite the geographic disparity. Stakeholders differentiate between factors related to climate change impacts and land use change impacts. Water, energy, and renewable energy related issues pose serious concerns to island stakeholders and management measures are needed to address them. • Climate change is perceived by warmer temperatures, while land use change by deforestation. • Water scarcity and related risks are top priorities for stakeholders. • Energy-related risks, including deficiency and problems with wind and solar facilities, rank high. • Stakeholders perceive natural habitat destruction and biodiversity loss as top negative risks. • Land use change impacts are also negative but more complex to explain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108199
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The land use-climate change-biodiversity nexus in the perceptions of European islands stakeholders

Ioannis Ν. Vogiatzakis, Christos Zoumides, Mauro Fois, Bruna Almeida et al.
6 citations
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
Climate Change and Environmental Impact
6.63
article

The land use-climate change-biodiversity nexus in the perceptions of European islands stakeholders

Ioannis Ν. Vogiatzakis, Christos Zoumides, Mauro Fois, Bruna Almeida, George Zittis, Aikaterini Christopoulou, Eirini Gallou, Sonia Quiroga, Artur Gil, Elli Tzirkalli, Nazlı Demirel, Irene Christoforidi, Francisco J. Expósito, Savvas Zotos, Rannveig Ólafsdóttir, Mario V. Balzan, Aleksandra Dragin, Kristina Košić, Mirela Tase, Cristina Suárez, Paraskevi Manolaki, Mercedes Cano, Aristides Moustakas, Lütfi Atay, Maja Mijatov Ladičorbić, Vladimir Stojanović, Damian Łowicki, Juan P. Díaz, Valentini Stamatiadou, Haoran Wang, Çiğdem Kaptan Ayhan, Mark D.C. Mansoldo, Panos Chrysos
article en
6 citations

Abstract

To promote climate adaptation and mitigation strategies, it is crucial to understand the perspectives and knowledge gaps of stakeholders involved in functions affected by or addressing land use and climate changes. A large number of stakeholders across 21 European islands were consulted regarding their views on climate change and land use change issues affecting ecosystem services on their island. Climate change characteristics perceptions included variables such as temperature, precipitation, humidity, extremes, and wind. Land use change characteristics perceptions included deforestation, coastal degradation, habitat protection, renewable energy facilities, wetlands and other variables. Other environmental and societal problem perceptions such as invasive species, water or energy scarcity, problems in infrastructures or austerity were also included. Climate and land use change impact perceptions were analysed with machine learning to quantify their importance on the perception outcome. For example if a stakeholder perceives that pollution, coastal degradation, deforestation, precipitation decrease, and increase of humidity are occurring on the island, and austerity is the biggest problem how likely is that the impact of climate change or land use change will be quantified by the stakeholder as negative, unclear, neutral, or positive? The predominant climatic change characteristic is related with temperature, and the predominant land use change characteristic with deforestation. Water-related problems are top priorities for stakeholders. Energy-related problems, such as energy deficiency but also wind and solar energy facilities problems, rank high as combined climate change and land use change risks. Stakeholders generally perceive climate change impacts on ecosystem services as negative, with natural habitat destruction and biodiversity loss identified as the top variables. Land use change impacts are also negative but also more complex to explain, with a higher number of explanatory variables associated with the impact outcome. Stakeholders have common perceptions regarding climate change and land use change impacts on the benefits of biodiversity despite the geographic disparity. Stakeholders differentiate between factors related to climate change impacts and land use change impacts. Water, energy, and renewable energy related issues pose serious concerns to island stakeholders and management measures are needed to address them. • Climate change is perceived by warmer temperatures, while land use change by deforestation. • Water scarcity and related risks are top priorities for stakeholders. • Energy-related risks, including deficiency and problems with wind and solar facilities, rank high. • Stakeholders perceive natural habitat destruction and biodiversity loss as top negative risks. • Land use change impacts are also negative but more complex to explain.

Environmental Impact Assessment ReviewVol. 117
Universidade dos Açores (PT), Landscape Institute (GB), University of Crete (GR), Cyprus Institute (CY), University of Iceland (IS), University of Novi Sad (RS), University of Cagliari (IT), University of Strathclyde (GB), Hellenic Mediterranean University (GR), Harokopio University of Athens (GR), Malta College of Arts, Science and Technology (MT), Institut de Ciències del Mar (ES), Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań (PL), Open University of Cyprus (CY), Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE), Istanbul University (TR), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT), University of the Aegean (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Climate Change and Environmental Impact
6.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.