Exploring the impact of an Electronic Medical Record implementation on the quality of nursing handover: a comparative case-study. (Preprint)

<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Ineffective clinical handover has the potential to compromise patient safety and quality of care. Standardising the handover process is a widely adopted improvement strategy intended to reduce failures of information transfer. By enabling real-time access to patient information, Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) could address communication issues inherent to nursing handover. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> This case study sought to compare handover occurring at EMR-enabled sites with that occurring at paper-based sites in a single Australian public health service to examine differences in handover quality. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> A mixed-methods research design was utilised, incorporating an observational audit of 60 handovers and post-handover surveys conducted in both EMR-enabled and paper-based ward environments, allowing analysis between the two cohorts. Quality was measured as compliance against key principles of the organisation’s Clinical Handover Standard and ratings of perceived handover quality from handover recipients. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> Overall compliance with the Clinical Handover Standard was comparable. Key differences between the two cohorts included improved bedside handover and patient engagement factors in the paper-based environments, while improved transfer of critical alerts and risks occurred in the EMR-enabled wards both more efficiently and with fewer interruptions. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> The presence of an EMR, particularly the design and functionality of the EMR interface, may act as a barrier to bedside handover, patient engagement in the handover process and the delivery of patient centred care. These barriers require further investigation and targeted solutions. While reported benefits suggest a degree of user acceptance of the EMR, the ongoing reliance on paper-based handover forms indicates a gap where the EMR does not yet adequately support nursing handover. </sec> <sec> <title>CLINICALTRIAL</title> N/A </sec>

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.85909
Primary Topic
Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the impact of an Electronic Medical Record implementation on the quality of nursing handover: a comparative case-study. (Preprint)

Lisa Browning, Urooj Raza Khan, James Boyd, Sandra G. Leggat et al.
Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
article

Exploring the impact of an Electronic Medical Record implementation on the quality of nursing handover: a comparative case-study. (Preprint)

Lisa Browning, Urooj Raza Khan, James Boyd, Sandra G. Leggat, Nick Monypenny
article en

Abstract

<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Ineffective clinical handover has the potential to compromise patient safety and quality of care. Standardising the handover process is a widely adopted improvement strategy intended to reduce failures of information transfer. By enabling real-time access to patient information, Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) could address communication issues inherent to nursing handover. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> This case study sought to compare handover occurring at EMR-enabled sites with that occurring at paper-based sites in a single Australian public health service to examine differences in handover quality. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> A mixed-methods research design was utilised, incorporating an observational audit of 60 handovers and post-handover surveys conducted in both EMR-enabled and paper-based ward environments, allowing analysis between the two cohorts. Quality was measured as compliance against key principles of the organisation’s Clinical Handover Standard and ratings of perceived handover quality from handover recipients. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> Overall compliance with the Clinical Handover Standard was comparable. Key differences between the two cohorts included improved bedside handover and patient engagement factors in the paper-based environments, while improved transfer of critical alerts and risks occurred in the EMR-enabled wards both more efficiently and with fewer interruptions. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> The presence of an EMR, particularly the design and functionality of the EMR interface, may act as a barrier to bedside handover, patient engagement in the handover process and the delivery of patient centred care. These barriers require further investigation and targeted solutions. While reported benefits suggest a degree of user acceptance of the EMR, the ongoing reliance on paper-based handover forms indicates a gap where the EMR does not yet adequately support nursing handover. </sec> <sec> <title>CLINICALTRIAL</title> N/A </sec>

Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring the impact of an Electronic Medical Record implementation on the quality of nursing handover: a comparative case-study. (Preprint) — Lisa Browning, Urooj Raza Khan, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS