'That Would Have Been Bad': How Radiologists Interact with Voice User Interface systems When Authoring Reports

This paper presents an exploration of how UK radiologists interact with VUI systems and peripherals when authoring diagnostic reports. We conducted a laboratory study with 10 practicing clinical radiologists to investigate the ways in which radiologists utilise speech-based technology to construct, edit and proof their work by having them report on real-world anonymised medical studies on camera. A sample of the participants also participated in interviews in which their data was collaboratively analysed and examined to offer deeper insight into the realism and generalisability of our findings and conclusions. We conclude that better training should be given to radiologists on how VUI systems work, and further investigation should be carried out on the best ways to interact with Speech To Text systems in safety critical environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3757444
Primary Topic
Radiology practices and education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

'That Would Have Been Bad': How Radiologists Interact with Voice User Interface systems When Authoring Reports

Phillip Wardle, Thomas Micic, Tom Owen, Martin Porcheron et al.
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Radiology practices and education
article

'That Would Have Been Bad': How Radiologists Interact with Voice User Interface systems When Authoring Reports

Phillip Wardle, Thomas Micic, Tom Owen, Martin Porcheron, Matt Jones, Rory Stuart Clark, Bethany Delahaye
article en

Abstract

This paper presents an exploration of how UK radiologists interact with VUI systems and peripherals when authoring diagnostic reports. We conducted a laboratory study with 10 practicing clinical radiologists to investigate the ways in which radiologists utilise speech-based technology to construct, edit and proof their work by having them report on real-world anonymised medical studies on camera. A sample of the participants also participated in interviews in which their data was collaboratively analysed and examined to offer deeper insight into the realism and generalisability of our findings and conclusions. We conclude that better training should be given to radiologists on how VUI systems work, and further investigation should be carried out on the best ways to interact with Speech To Text systems in safety critical environments.

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer InteractionVol. 9(7)
University of Bristol (GB), Swansea University (GB), Insight Healthcare (GB), Higher Education Academy (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Radiology practices and education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

'That Would Have Been Bad': How Radiologists Interact with Voice User Interface systems When Authoring Reports — Phillip Wardle, Thomas Micic, et al. · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS