Detecting Expert-Written Comments in Stack Exchange

Online question-answering platforms, such as Stack Exchange, have grown rapidly in recent years, making it necessary to identify the credibility of users and the information they share online to maintain trust within these communities. This issue can be addressed through accurate expert detection methods to determine whether or not a comment is written by an expert. For our study, we conducted analyses on a dataset consisting of various posts and comments written by over 10,000 Stack Exchange users to identify which classification techniques can most accurately distinguish between the written contributions of experts and non-experts. After comparing 12 methods across the six different communities that we analyzed in Stack Exchange (e.g, Physics), we discovered that GEMNET, our Generative AI based embedding approach, achieved the highest average F1-scores for experts. GEMNET also shows high generalization capabilities, achieving 17% higher F1-scores for experts compared to BERT, another top-performing model. Additionally, by testing GEMNET across different class imbalance ratios, we found that it helped maintain a high detection rate even when the class imbalance became more skewed to reality. Our results demonstrate GEMNET to be an improved expert detection method compared to traditional and newer classification techniques.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/hpec67600.2025.11196502
Primary Topic
Expert finding and Q&A systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detecting Expert-Written Comments in Stack Exchange

Courtland VanDam, Rohan Leekha, Nour Jedidi, Himani Musku et al.
Expert finding and Q&A systems
article

Detecting Expert-Written Comments in Stack Exchange

Courtland VanDam, Rohan Leekha, Nour Jedidi, Himani Musku, Alea Ritchie
article en

Abstract

Online question-answering platforms, such as Stack Exchange, have grown rapidly in recent years, making it necessary to identify the credibility of users and the information they share online to maintain trust within these communities. This issue can be addressed through accurate expert detection methods to determine whether or not a comment is written by an expert. For our study, we conducted analyses on a dataset consisting of various posts and comments written by over 10,000 Stack Exchange users to identify which classification techniques can most accurately distinguish between the written contributions of experts and non-experts. After comparing 12 methods across the six different communities that we analyzed in Stack Exchange (e.g, Physics), we discovered that GEMNET, our Generative AI based embedding approach, achieved the highest average F1-scores for experts. GEMNET also shows high generalization capabilities, achieving 17% higher F1-scores for experts compared to BERT, another top-performing model. Additionally, by testing GEMNET across different class imbalance ratios, we found that it helped maintain a high detection rate even when the class imbalance became more skewed to reality. Our results demonstrate GEMNET to be an improved expert detection method compared to traditional and newer classification techniques.

MIT Lincoln Laboratory (US), Carnegie Mellon University (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Expert finding and Q&A systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Detecting Expert-Written Comments in Stack Exchange — Courtland VanDam, Rohan Leekha, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS