Contextual constraints and dilemmas influencing health providers’ prescription practices in a conflict-affected area: Qualitative insights from Mopti, Mali

Armed conflicts present complex, multidimensional challenges that severely compromise both access to and the quality of healthcare, including the adequate prescription of essential medicines. This study aimed to identify and understand the factors underlying the irrational prescribing of medicine in areas affected by armed conflict in the Mopti region in Mali. An exploratory qualitative study was conducted using a semi-structured interview guide to collect data from 30 participants, including health professionals from three health districts, representatives of the regional health directorate, members of community health associations, and staff from non-governmental organisations (NGOs) working in health sector. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and subjected to thematic content analysis, using NVIVO 14 (2023 version) to support coding and data retrieval. Study participants reported a range of health system- and patient-related factors contributing to irrational prescribing practices in these conflict-affected areas. Health systems factors included: an imbalance between workload and the availability of qualified staff; limited access to professional training and training resources; poor adherence to prescription guidelines and procedures -often a consequence of contextual constraints; and coercion from armed terrorist groups. Administrative and political challenges were also highlighted, including weak monitoring and supervision mechanisms within the local health system; a lack of oversight by health and regulatory authorities in blockaded areas; the development of an informal pharmaceutical sector to compensate for deficiencies in the formal system; and overprescription of medicines linked to insurance schemes. Patient-related factors included delayed care-seeking linked to regional insecurity and contributing to increased morbidity and worsened health outcomes. Our results show that the multiple contextual factors influencing prescribing of medicines are deeply inter-linked. Efforts to improve the quality of prescribing in conflict zones must recognise that practices often deemed 'irrational' are shaped by complex contextual constraints. A coordinated and comprehensive approach involving all health systems stakeholders is required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004621
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contextual constraints and dilemmas influencing health providers’ prescription practices in a conflict-affected area: Qualitative insights from Mopti, Mali

Karina Kielmann, Seydou Doumbia, Raffaella Ravinetto, Yacouba Diarra et al.
1 citations
PLOS Global Public Health
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
1.22
article

Contextual constraints and dilemmas influencing health providers’ prescription practices in a conflict-affected area: Qualitative insights from Mopti, Mali

Karina Kielmann, Seydou Doumbia, Raffaella Ravinetto, Yacouba Diarra, Mohamed Ali Ag Ahmed, Issa Coulibaly
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Armed conflicts present complex, multidimensional challenges that severely compromise both access to and the quality of healthcare, including the adequate prescription of essential medicines. This study aimed to identify and understand the factors underlying the irrational prescribing of medicine in areas affected by armed conflict in the Mopti region in Mali. An exploratory qualitative study was conducted using a semi-structured interview guide to collect data from 30 participants, including health professionals from three health districts, representatives of the regional health directorate, members of community health associations, and staff from non-governmental organisations (NGOs) working in health sector. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and subjected to thematic content analysis, using NVIVO 14 (2023 version) to support coding and data retrieval. Study participants reported a range of health system- and patient-related factors contributing to irrational prescribing practices in these conflict-affected areas. Health systems factors included: an imbalance between workload and the availability of qualified staff; limited access to professional training and training resources; poor adherence to prescription guidelines and procedures -often a consequence of contextual constraints; and coercion from armed terrorist groups. Administrative and political challenges were also highlighted, including weak monitoring and supervision mechanisms within the local health system; a lack of oversight by health and regulatory authorities in blockaded areas; the development of an informal pharmaceutical sector to compensate for deficiencies in the formal system; and overprescription of medicines linked to insurance schemes. Patient-related factors included delayed care-seeking linked to regional insecurity and contributing to increased morbidity and worsened health outcomes. Our results show that the multiple contextual factors influencing prescribing of medicines are deeply inter-linked. Efforts to improve the quality of prescribing in conflict zones must recognise that practices often deemed 'irrational' are shaped by complex contextual constraints. A coordinated and comprehensive approach involving all health systems stakeholders is required.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 5(10)
Queen Margaret University (GB), Université des Sciences, des Techniques et des Technologies de Bamako (ML), Université de Montréal (CA), Instituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde (BE), University of the Western Cape (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
1.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.