Benchmarking Deep Learning with Representative ONNX Subgraphs

Despite the ubiquity of deep learning (DL), there are a surprisingly limited number of accepted benchmarks for the task. The most common benchmark suite, MLPerf, tests the behavior of representative models from a variety of domains and showcases their peak performance. However, this benchmark does not provide insight into how a custom model will run on your system unless you happen to be using one of the models that are part of the benchmark (only one per domain). The insights yielded by MLPerf offer limited details into the behavior of the processor and do not show expected performance on a more general body of models. This research proposes, therefore, to leverage information about deep-learning models to support the creation of a data-driven subgraph benchmark. This research gathers key operational subgraphs from image-classification models and demonstrates that they can be used to characterize the performance of a system overall. This characterization offers a pathway inter-device comparison when the task is known but the device (and model specifics) are not.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/hpec67600.2025.11196650
Primary Topic
Machine Learning and Data Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking Deep Learning with Representative ONNX Subgraphs

Evan W. Gretok, David Langerman, Alan D. George, Ian Peitzsch et al.
Machine Learning and Data Classification
article

Benchmarking Deep Learning with Representative ONNX Subgraphs

Evan W. Gretok, David Langerman, Alan D. George, Ian Peitzsch, Calvin B. Gealy, Marika E. Schubert, Jefferson Boothe
article en

Abstract

Despite the ubiquity of deep learning (DL), there are a surprisingly limited number of accepted benchmarks for the task. The most common benchmark suite, MLPerf, tests the behavior of representative models from a variety of domains and showcases their peak performance. However, this benchmark does not provide insight into how a custom model will run on your system unless you happen to be using one of the models that are part of the benchmark (only one per domain). The insights yielded by MLPerf offer limited details into the behavior of the processor and do not show expected performance on a more general body of models. This research proposes, therefore, to leverage information about deep-learning models to support the creation of a data-driven subgraph benchmark. This research gathers key operational subgraphs from image-classification models and demonstrates that they can be used to characterize the performance of a system overall. This characterization offers a pathway inter-device comparison when the task is known but the device (and model specifics) are not.

University of Pittsburgh (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Machine Learning and Data Classification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Benchmarking Deep Learning with Representative ONNX Subgraphs — Evan W. Gretok, David Langerman, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS