Safeguarding Crowdsourcing Surveys from ChatGPT through Prompt Injection

ChatGPT and other large language models (LLMs) have proven useful in crowdsourcing tasks, where they can effectively annotate machine learning training data. However, this means that they also have the potential for misuse, specifically to automatically answer surveys. LLMs can potentially circumvent quality assurance measures, thereby threatening the integrity of methodologies that rely on crowdsourcing surveys. In this paper, we propose a mechanism to detect LLM-generated responses to surveys. The mechanism uses ''prompt injection,'' such as directions that can mislead LLMs into giving predictable responses. We evaluate our technique against a range of question scenarios, types, and positions, and find that it can reliably detect LLM-generated responses with more than 98% effectiveness. We also provide an open-source software to help survey designers use our technique to detect LLM responses. Our work is a step in ensuring that survey methodologies remain rigorous vis-a-vis LLMs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3757503
Primary Topic
Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safeguarding Crowdsourcing Surveys from ChatGPT through Prompt Injection

Samuel Kernan Freire, Vassilis Kostakos, Chaofan Wang, Evangelos Niforatos et al.
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
article

Safeguarding Crowdsourcing Surveys from ChatGPT through Prompt Injection

Samuel Kernan Freire, Vassilis Kostakos, Chaofan Wang, Evangelos Niforatos, Jorge Gonçalves, Mo Zhang, Alessandro Bozzon, Jing Wei
article en

Abstract

ChatGPT and other large language models (LLMs) have proven useful in crowdsourcing tasks, where they can effectively annotate machine learning training data. However, this means that they also have the potential for misuse, specifically to automatically answer surveys. LLMs can potentially circumvent quality assurance measures, thereby threatening the integrity of methodologies that rely on crowdsourcing surveys. In this paper, we propose a mechanism to detect LLM-generated responses to surveys. The mechanism uses ''prompt injection,'' such as directions that can mislead LLMs into giving predictable responses. We evaluate our technique against a range of question scenarios, types, and positions, and find that it can reliably detect LLM-generated responses with more than 98% effectiveness. We also provide an open-source software to help survey designers use our technique to detect LLM responses. Our work is a step in ensuring that survey methodologies remain rigorous vis-a-vis LLMs.

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer InteractionVol. 9(7)
Birmingham City University (GB), Wenzhou University (CN), The University of Melbourne (AU), University of Birmingham (GB), The Hague University of Applied Sciences (NL), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.