The Chilling: Identifying Strategic Antisocial Behavior Online and Examining the Impact on Journalists

On social platforms like Twitter, strategic targeted attacks are becoming increasingly common, especially against vulnerable groups such as female journalists. Two key challenges in identifying strategic online behavior are the complex structure of online conversations and the hidden nature of potential strategies that drive user behavior. To address these, we develop a new tree-structured Transformer model that categorizes replies based on their hierarchical conversation structures, offering insights into the latent strategies underlying these interactions. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our proposed classification model can effectively detect different user groups--namely attackers, supporters, and bystanders--and their latent strategies. To demonstrate the utility of our approach, we apply this classifier to real-time Twitter data and conduct a series of quantitative analyses on the interactions between journalistswith diverse cultural backgrounds and different groups of users--attackers, supporters, and bystanders. Our classification approach allows us to not only explore strategic behaviors of attackers but also those of supporters and bystanders who engage in online interactions. When examining the impact of online attacks, we find a strong correlation between the presence of attackers' interactions and chilling effects , where journalists tend to slow their subsequent posting behavior. Additionally, we find that attackers tend to negatively influence the posting behavior of other users within these conversations. As conversations deepen, replies often deviate from original posts and get more toxic. This paper provides a deeper understanding of how different user groups engage in online discussions and highlights the detrimental effects of attacker presence on journalists, other users, and conversational outcomes. Our findings underscore the need for social platforms to develop tools that address coordinated toxicity and foster healthier conversation dynamics. By detecting patterns of coordinated attacks early, platforms could limit the visibility of toxic content to prevent escalation. Additionally, providing journalists and users with tools for real-time reporting and de-escalation could empower them to manage hostile interactions more effectively. Enhanced moderation tools targeting coordinated behaviors, particularly among attackers, could ensure a safer environment for vulnerable groups like female journalists, ultimately supporting constructive discussions and resilient online communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3757668
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Chilling: Identifying Strategic Antisocial Behavior Online and Examining the Impact on Journalists

Hari Sundaram, Eshwar Chandrasekharan, Yian Wang, Mukhilshankar Umashankar
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Social Media and Politics
article

The Chilling: Identifying Strategic Antisocial Behavior Online and Examining the Impact on Journalists

Hari Sundaram, Eshwar Chandrasekharan, Yian Wang, Mukhilshankar Umashankar
article en

Abstract

On social platforms like Twitter, strategic targeted attacks are becoming increasingly common, especially against vulnerable groups such as female journalists. Two key challenges in identifying strategic online behavior are the complex structure of online conversations and the hidden nature of potential strategies that drive user behavior. To address these, we develop a new tree-structured Transformer model that categorizes replies based on their hierarchical conversation structures, offering insights into the latent strategies underlying these interactions. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our proposed classification model can effectively detect different user groups--namely attackers, supporters, and bystanders--and their latent strategies. To demonstrate the utility of our approach, we apply this classifier to real-time Twitter data and conduct a series of quantitative analyses on the interactions between journalistswith diverse cultural backgrounds and different groups of users--attackers, supporters, and bystanders. Our classification approach allows us to not only explore strategic behaviors of attackers but also those of supporters and bystanders who engage in online interactions. When examining the impact of online attacks, we find a strong correlation between the presence of attackers' interactions and chilling effects , where journalists tend to slow their subsequent posting behavior. Additionally, we find that attackers tend to negatively influence the posting behavior of other users within these conversations. As conversations deepen, replies often deviate from original posts and get more toxic. This paper provides a deeper understanding of how different user groups engage in online discussions and highlights the detrimental effects of attacker presence on journalists, other users, and conversational outcomes. Our findings underscore the need for social platforms to develop tools that address coordinated toxicity and foster healthier conversation dynamics. By detecting patterns of coordinated attacks early, platforms could limit the visibility of toxic content to prevent escalation. Additionally, providing journalists and users with tools for real-time reporting and de-escalation could empower them to manage hostile interactions more effectively. Enhanced moderation tools targeting coordinated behaviors, particularly among attackers, could ensure a safer environment for vulnerable groups like female journalists, ultimately supporting constructive discussions and resilient online communities.

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer InteractionVol. 9(7)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.